Publication 3930

Nelson A. (1994) How could scientific facts be socially constructed? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25(4): 535–547. Fulltext at
A number of innovative case studies of episodes in the history of science have appeared in recent years that are plausibly called constructivist. Although the authors are primarily sociologists and historians, many of these studies dissolve interdisciplinary boundaries and address central philosophical problems about science. Some have received nearly universal praise as history and sociology, but the philosophical component has generated a good deal of controversy. This essay explores a new kind of argument that often appears in these works for overtly philosophical doctrines, and concludes by trying to evaluate the bearing of this new form of argument on the principal points of contention between constructivists and their philosophical opponents.

Similar publications:

Log in to view a list of similar publications

The publication has not yet bookmarked in any reading list

You cannot bookmark this publication into a reading list because you are not member of any
Log in to create one.

There are currently no annotations

To add an annotation you need to log in first

Download statistics

Log in to view the download statistics for this publication
Export bibliographic details as: CF Format · APA · BibTex · EndNote · Harvard · MLA · Nature · RIS · Science