Bunnell P. (2000) Attributing nature with justifications. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17: 469–480. Fulltext at https://cepa.info/4236
Attributing nature with justifications.
Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17: 469–480.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/4236
I claim that concepts such as competition, evolution of the fittest and regulation through hierarchical constructs are all attributions we make to nature based on our culture. I think these concepts, and others of like ilk, are the results of a particular manner of emotioning, sensing and acting that is now common to most of our modern cultures. Once attributed to nature, we use these concepts as grounding premises, or as justification, to continue the manner of emotioning, sensing and acting which gave rise to them. I see this as a disquieting circularity, a blindness, that results in a way of being that we do not want, but feel compelled to. However, since we have the ability to reflect on our beliefs and to consider whether we want the consequences of maintaining them, I also see the possibility of living in a manner that we find more ethical and more pleasurable.