Publication 5653

Meynen H. T. (1992) The bringing forth of dialogue: Latour versus Maturana. In: Van de Vijver G. (ed.) New Perspectives on cybernetics: Self-organization, autonomy and connectionism. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 157–174. Fulltext at
After introducing the problem and a short impression of the work of Humberto Maturana, I elaborate on his ideas concerning science and the scientific explanation (1.) and objectivity (2.). In an evaluation of these views I claim that we cannot accept some consequences of Maturana’s theory, because they leave no space for discussion (3.). I then turn to Bruno Latour, and after a short introduction (4.) proceed to claim that there are some interesting similarities between Latour and Maturana (5.), especially in their respective ideas on the praxis of explaining. I further claim that Latour’s idea of ‘infrareflexivity’ constitutes a way out of the problems with Maturana’s theory (6.). I conclude with a ‘plea for taking dialogue seriously’ (7.). Along the way, it turns out, I could show Latour a counterexample of his claim that systems theorists are not aware of their own role in creating ‘systems’.

Similar publications:

Log in to view a list of similar publications

The publication has not yet bookmarked in any reading list

You cannot bookmark this publication into a reading list because you are not member of any
Log in to create one.

There are currently no annotations

To add an annotation you need to log in first

Download statistics

Log in to view the download statistics for this publication
Export bibliographic details as: CF Format · APA · BibTex · EndNote · Harvard · MLA · Nature · RIS · Science