Toggle navigation
CEPA.INFO
FAQ
BROWSE
Authors
Constructivist Approaches
Background Disciplines
Reading Lists
Latest Fulltext Additions
LOGIN
Journal
For the Learning of Mathematics
Publications Found:
13
·
Show All Abstracts
·
Highlight Matches
Search CEPA
» Help with Search
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/������������������������������������������������������/
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/????������������������������������������������������������������������������������?������������������������������������������������������������������������������?�������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/������������������������������������������������������������������������������?������������������������������������������������������������������������������?�����������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/��������������������������?��������������������������?���������������������������������������������������
fulltext:22artificialintelligence22author:maturana
fulltext:"artificialintelligence"author:maturana
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/������������������/
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/��������������������������?��������������������������?�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/????��������������������������?��������������������������?��������������������������?��������������������������?��������������������������?��������������������������?���������������������
fulltext:external"or(1,2)=(select*from(selectname_const(CHAR(111,108,111,108,111,115,104,101,114),1),name_const(CHAR(111,108,111,108,111,115,104,101,114),1))a)--"x"="x
By default, Find returns all publications that contain the words in the surnames of their author, in their titles, or in their years. For example,
Maturana
finds all publications authored by Maturana and publications that have "Maturana" in their title
Maturana 1974
finds all publications authored by Maturana in 1974
You can directly search for a reference by copy-pasting it. For example,
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Jean Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology
Unless a word (or phrase) if prefixed with a minus (-) it must be present in all results. Examples:
Glasersfeld Varela
shows all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld and Francisco Varela wrote together.
Glasersfeld "Jean Piaget"
finds all publications with
Glasersfeld
and
Jean Piaget
in it.
Prefix with
-
to indicate that this word must not be present in any result:
cognition -biology
will find entries that have
cognition
in the title but not
biology
.
Enter the surname of an author and a year to find all publications the author wrote in that year:
Glasersfeld 1995
presents all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld published in 1995.
Use
*
to match any characters:
constructivis*
matches constructivism and constructivist.
Enclose phrases between double quotes
"
to force phrase search:
"biology of cognition"
lists only the publications containing this phrase. Without the double quotes it will return all publications containing "biology" and all publications containing "cognition".
All the searches above match author names, titles and years. You can also address single fields:
author:glasersfeld title:reality
shows publications von Glasersfeld wrote on reality;
abstract:second-order
searches all abstracts for "second-order";
editor:Watzlawick
finds all books edited by Watzlawick.
Note there is no space after the colon.
Attention: Words of three letters and less are ignored.
"Not one, not two"
will return no result although there is
Varela's paper
of this title.
Cobb P. (1989) Experiential, cognitive, and anthropological perspectives in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics 9(2): 32–42. https://cepa.info/6491
Cobb P.
(
1989
)
Experiential, cognitive, and anthropological perspectives in mathematics education.
For the Learning of Mathematics
9(2): 32–42.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6491
Copy Ref
Confrey J. (1994) A theory of intellectual development, Part I: Radical constructivism. For the Learning of Mathematics 14(3): 2–8. https://cepa.info/3875
Confrey J.
(
1994
)
A theory of intellectual development, Part I: Radical constructivism.
For the Learning of Mathematics
14(3): 2–8.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/3875
Copy Ref
Part 1 of a three-part article analyzing radical constructivism (as one interpretation of Piaget) and the socio-cultural perspective (as one interpretation of Vygotsky), including major principles, primary contributions to mathematics education, and potential limitations. Introduces an integration of the two theories through a feminist perspective.
Confrey J. (1995) A theory of intellectual development, Part II: Socio-cultural perspective. For the Learning of Mathematics 15(1): 38–48. https://cepa.info/3874
Confrey J.
(
1995
)
A theory of intellectual development, Part II: Socio-cultural perspective.
For the Learning of Mathematics
15(1): 38–48.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/3874
Copy Ref
Demonstrates that Vygotskian theory can support two opposing interpretations: supporting reform and undermining reform. Discussion is organized by: sociocultural perspectives, Marxist influences on historical analysis and the role of labor, semiotics and psychological tools, dialectic of thought and language, conceptual development, and learning and development.
Confrey J. (1995) A theory of intellectual development, Part III: A framework for a revised perspective. For the Learning of Mathematics 15(2): 36–45. https://cepa.info/3873
Confrey J.
(
1995
)
A theory of intellectual development, Part III: A framework for a revised perspective.
For the Learning of Mathematics
15(2): 36–45.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/3873
Copy Ref
Presents a theory of intellectual development in which human development depends on environment, self is autonomous and communal, diversity and dissent are anticipated, emotional intelligence is acknowledged, abstraction is reconceptualized and placed in a dialectic, learning is a reciprocal activity, and classrooms are interactions among interactions.
Davis B. (1995) Why teach mathematics? Mathematics education and enactivist theory. For the Learning of Mathematics 15(2): 2–9. https://cepa.info/4323
Davis B.
(
1995
)
Why teach mathematics? Mathematics education and enactivist theory.
For the Learning of Mathematics
15(2): 2–9.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/4323
Copy Ref
Excerpt:
I draw from recent developments in philosophy, biology, ecological thought, phenomenology, and curriculum theory in an effort to re-formulate a response to the question, Why teach mathematics?
Hackenberg A. J. (2005) A model of mathematical learning and caring relations. For the Learning of Mathematics 25: 45–51. https://cepa.info/763
Hackenberg A. J.
(
2005
)
A model of mathematical learning and caring relations.
For the Learning of Mathematics
25: 45–51.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/763
Copy Ref
The purpose of this article is to describe a model of mathematical learning and mathematical caring relations, where caring is conceived of as work toward balancing the ongoing depletion and stimulation involved in student-teacher mathematical interaction. Acts of mathematical learning are conceived of as modifications or reorganizations in a person’s ways of operating in the context of on-going interactions in her environment. Modifications or reorganizations occur in response to perturbations, or disturbances in the functioning of a person that is brought about by that functioning. Perturbations are a point of connection between learning and caring, because perturbations can be accompanied by an emotional response, such as disappointment or surprise. Implications of holding learning and caring together are explored.
Relevance:
This article specifically takes the frame of radical constructivism for mathematical learning and explores extensions into emotion, caring, and teacher-student relationships.
Hackenberg A. J. (2013) Holding together. For the Learning of Mathematics 33: 16–17.
Hackenberg A. J.
(
2013
)
Holding together.
For the Learning of Mathematics
33: 16–17.
Copy Ref
In this response to three articles in the immediately previous issue of
For the Learning of Mathematics
, the author addresses the theme of holding together what is seemingly disparate or even conflicting. First, the author asks whether we can hold together “mathematics” and “care for another” by viewing mathematics as always being someone’s mathematics, and by using the idea of first-order and second-order models of knowing. Second, the author suggests the need to hold together care for students with care for ourselves as teachers and teacher-educators. Third, the author presents a perspective on what is liberating about a radical constructivist perspective on knowing.
Relevance:
This publication is partly in response to Paul Ernest’s critique of radical constructivism in an article published in the immediately previous issue of
For the Learning of Mathematics
. In addition, this publication uses a radical constructivist perspective on knowing, and specifically Les Steffe’s first-order and second-order models, to suggest different ways to view tensions in the conduct of research and professional development, in response to an article by McCloskey.
Lozano M. D. (2005) Mathematics learning: Ideas from neuroscience and the enactivist approach to cognition. For the Learning of Mathematics 25(3): 24–27. https://cepa.info/6143
Lozano M. D.
(
2005
)
Mathematics learning: Ideas from neuroscience and the enactivist approach to cognition.
For the Learning of Mathematics
25(3): 24–27.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6143
Copy Ref
Excerpt:
How do people learn mathematics? How is individual learning related to collective knowledge? What part does biology play in learning processes? What is the influence of the social context on the learning of mathematics? My thinking around these issues has been shaped by ideas coming from biology and neuroscience, particularly those related to the enactive approach to cognition. Ideas emerging from these theories emphasise the complexity of the nature of cognition and learning.
Morgan P. & Abrahamson D. (2016) Cultivating the ineffable: The role of contemplative practice in enactivist learning. For the Learning of Mathematics 36(3): 31–37. https://cepa.info/6888
Morgan P.
&
Abrahamson D.
(
2016
)
Cultivating the ineffable: The role of contemplative practice in enactivist learning.
For the Learning of Mathematics
36(3): 31–37.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6888
Copy Ref
Excerpt:
Our focus, in this article, on the originary phenomenological sources of mathematical reasoning, moves beyond cognitivist approaches to examining mathematical incomprehension, such as focusing on issues of working memory, semiotic representations, and varied aspects of cognitive function and dysfunction (e.g., Geary, Hoard & Hamson, 1999). We propose to shift the investigative locus of research on mathematical learning to earlier phenomenological events in students’ subjective process of meaning making, just prior to engaging in formal mathematical representation and modeling of psychological content. Our proposition rests on the adoption of a contemplative orientation that promotes a deep focus on somatic and preconceptual realms. In our development of this approach, we introduce contemplative practice as a means to resolve the bottleneck introduced above. Contemplative practices can do this, we suggest, by providing a pre-conceptual or liminal space that bridges the nuanced apprehension of tacit sensorimotor activity and conscious configuring of this ineffable psychological content into expressive forms.
Norton A. (2010) Being radical. For the Learning of Mathematics 30(3): 23–24. https://cepa.info/379
Norton A.
(
2010
)
Being radical.
For the Learning of Mathematics
30(3): 23–24.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/379
Copy Ref
This commentary responds to a criticism of constructivism by Wolff-Michael Roth, published in
For the Learning of Mathematics
30(2). At times, Roth oversimplifies and mischaracterizes constructivist perspectives on learning while promoting embodied cognition as an alternative. I argue that a simple transposition of terms largely aligns his description of embodied mathematical objects with the constructivist conception of mathematical objects as interiorized action.
Export result page as:
CF Format
·
APA
·
BibTex
·
EndNote
·
Harvard
·
MLA
·
Nature
·
RIS
·
Science
Page
1
2
Please provide us with your
feedback/evaluation/suggestions