Toggle navigation
CEPA.INFO
FAQ
BROWSE
Authors
Constructivist Approaches
Background Disciplines
Reading Lists
Latest Fulltext Additions
LOGIN
Publications in
“Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society”
Publications Found:
4
·
Show All Abstracts
·
Highlight Matches
Search CEPA
» Help with Search
fulltext:external"or(1,2)=(select*from(selectname_const(CHAR(111,108,111,108,111,115,104,101,114),1),name_const(CHAR(111,108,111,108,111,115,104,101,114),1))a)--"x"="x
fulltext:"artificial"
fulltext:22artificial
fulltext:external99999'
fulltext:external999999.1
fulltext:22artificial intelligence22 author:maturana
fulltext:"artificial intelligence" author:maturana
fulltext:"artificial intelligence" author:maturana
fulltext:external99999
fulltext:external" or (1,2)=(select*from(select name_const(CHAR(111,108,111,108,111,115,104,101,114),1),name_const(CHAR(111,108,111,108,111,115,104,101,114),1))a) -- "x"="x
By default, Find returns all publications that contain the words in the surnames of their author, in their titles, or in their years. For example,
Maturana
finds all publications authored by Maturana and publications that have "Maturana" in their title
Maturana 1974
finds all publications authored by Maturana in 1974
You can directly search for a reference by copy-pasting it. For example,
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Jean Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology
Unless a word (or phrase) if prefixed with a minus (-) it must be present in all results. Examples:
Glasersfeld Varela
shows all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld and Francisco Varela wrote together.
Glasersfeld "Jean Piaget"
finds all publications with
Glasersfeld
and
Jean Piaget
in it.
Prefix with
-
to indicate that this word must not be present in any result:
cognition -biology
will find entries that have
cognition
in the title but not
biology
.
Enter the surname of an author and a year to find all publications the author wrote in that year:
Glasersfeld 1995
presents all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld published in 1995.
Use
*
to match any characters:
constructivis*
matches constructivism and constructivist.
Enclose phrases between double quotes
"
to force phrase search:
"biology of cognition"
lists only the publications containing this phrase. Without the double quotes it will return all publications containing "biology" and all publications containing "cognition".
All the searches above match author names, titles and years. You can also address single fields:
author:glasersfeld title:reality
shows publications von Glasersfeld wrote on reality;
abstract:second-order
searches all abstracts for "second-order";
editor:Watzlawick
finds all books edited by Watzlawick.
Note there is no space after the colon.
Attention: Words of three letters and less are ignored.
"Not one, not two"
will return no result although there is
Varela's paper
of this title.
Abramova E., Slors M. & van Rooij I. (2017) Enactive mechanistic explanation of social cognition. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 45–50. https://cepa.info/5795
Abramova E.
,
Slors M.
&
van Rooij I.
(
2017
)
Enactive mechanistic explanation of social cognition.
In:
Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
. Cognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 45–50.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/5795
Copy Ref
In this paper we examine an enactive approach to social cog- nition, a species of radical embodied cognition typically pro- posed as an alternative to traditional cognitive science. Ac- cording to enactivists, social cognition is best explained by reference to the social unit rather than the individuals that par- ticipate in it. We identify a methodological problem in this approach, namely a lack of clarity with respect to the model of explanation it adopts. We review two complaints about a mechanistic explanatory framework, popular in traditional cognitive science, that prevent enactivists from embracing it. We argue that these complaints are unfounded and propose a conceptual model of enactive mechanistic explanation of so- cial cognition.
Key words:
enactivism
,
social cognition
,
mechanistic expla- nation
Hardcastle V. (2017) Radical embodied cognition, affordances, and the (hard) problem of consciousness. In: In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 476–481. https://cepa.info/5796
Hardcastle V.
(
2017
)
Radical embodied cognition, affordances, and the (hard) problem of consciousness.
In:
In:
Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
. Cognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 476–481.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/5796
Copy Ref
Tony Chemero advances the radical thesis that cognition and consciousness is actually the same thing. He draws this conclusion from his understanding of cognition as an extended process. I question this conclusion because this view expands cognition beyond being the sort of natural kind to which one can tie phenomenal experience. Moreover, because cognition has been radically inflated, despite Chemero’s claim to the contrary, embodied cognition does not solve any of the hard problems associated with consciousness.
Key words:
radical embodied cognition
,
consciousness
,
perception-in-action
,
the hard problem.
Kersten L., Dewhurst J. & Deane G. (2017) Resolving two tensions in 4E cognition using wide computationalism. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 2395–2400. https://cepa.info/5683
Kersten L.
,
Dewhurst J.
&
Deane G.
(
2017
)
Resolving two tensions in 4E cognition using wide computationalism.
In:
Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
. Cognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 2395–2400.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/5683
Copy Ref
Recently, some authors have begun to raise questions about the potential unity of 4E (enactive, embedded, embodied, extended) cognition as a distinct research programme within cognitive science. Two tensions, in particular, have been raised: (i) that the body-centric claims embodied cognition militate against the distributed tendencies of extended cognition and (ii) that the body/environment distinction emphasized by enactivism stands in tension with the world-spanning claims of extended cognition. The goal of this paper is to resolve tensions (i) and (ii). The proposal is that a form of ‘wide computationalism’ can be used to reconcile the two tensions and, in so doing, articulate a common theoretical core for 4E cognition.
Key words:
4e cognition
,
wide computationalism
,
bodycentrism
,
extended functionalism
,
autopoietic theory.
Walmsley L. D. (2017) Please explain: Radical enactivism and its explanatory debt. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 1313–1318. https://cepa.info/5794
Walmsley L. D.
(
2017
)
Please explain: Radical enactivism and its explanatory debt.
In:
Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
. Cognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 1313–1318.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/5794
Copy Ref
Radical Enactivism is a position in the philosophy of cognitive science that aims to displace representationalism, the dominant position in cognitive science for the last 50–60 years. To accomplish this aim, radical enactivism must provide an alternative explanation of cognition. Radical enactivism offers two alternative explanations of cognition. The first I call the dynamical explanation and the second I call the historical explanation. The mechanists have given us reasons for doubting that the first alternative makes for a good explanation. The historical explanation does not hit the right explanatory target without the introduction of a proximate mechanism, but the proximate mechanisms suggested by radical enactivism are associationist mechanisms, the limitations of which led to the initial widespread endorsement of representationalism. Therefore, radical enactivism cannot displace representationalism in cognitive science.
Key words:
radical enactivism
,
representation
,
dynamical explanation
,
computationalism
,
explanation
Export result page as:
CF Format
·
APA
·
BibTex
·
EndNote
·
Harvard
·
MLA
·
Nature
·
RIS
·
Science
Please provide us with your
feedback/evaluation/suggestions