Toggle navigation
CEPA.INFO
FAQ
BROWSE
Authors
Constructivist Approaches
Background Disciplines
Reading Lists
Latest Fulltext Additions
LOGIN
Chapters in
Research and reflexivity
Edited by
F. Steier
. Sage, London, 1991.
Publications Found:
7
·
Show All Abstracts
·
Highlight Matches
Search CEPA
» Help with Search
fulltext:external"or(1,2)=(select*from(selectname_const(CHAR(111,108,111,108,111,115,104,101,114),1),name_const(CHAR(111,108,111,108,111,115,104,101,114),1))a)--"x"="x
fulltext:"artificial"
fulltext:22artificial
fulltext:external99999'
fulltext:external999999.1
fulltext:22artificial intelligence22 author:maturana
fulltext:"artificial intelligence" author:maturana
fulltext:"artificial intelligence" author:maturana
fulltext:external99999
fulltext:external" or (1,2)=(select*from(select name_const(CHAR(111,108,111,108,111,115,104,101,114),1),name_const(CHAR(111,108,111,108,111,115,104,101,114),1))a) -- "x"="x
By default, Find returns all publications that contain the words in the surnames of their author, in their titles, or in their years. For example,
Maturana
finds all publications authored by Maturana and publications that have "Maturana" in their title
Maturana 1974
finds all publications authored by Maturana in 1974
You can directly search for a reference by copy-pasting it. For example,
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Jean Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology
Unless a word (or phrase) if prefixed with a minus (-) it must be present in all results. Examples:
Glasersfeld Varela
shows all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld and Francisco Varela wrote together.
Glasersfeld "Jean Piaget"
finds all publications with
Glasersfeld
and
Jean Piaget
in it.
Prefix with
-
to indicate that this word must not be present in any result:
cognition -biology
will find entries that have
cognition
in the title but not
biology
.
Enter the surname of an author and a year to find all publications the author wrote in that year:
Glasersfeld 1995
presents all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld published in 1995.
Use
*
to match any characters:
constructivis*
matches constructivism and constructivist.
Enclose phrases between double quotes
"
to force phrase search:
"biology of cognition"
lists only the publications containing this phrase. Without the double quotes it will return all publications containing "biology" and all publications containing "cognition".
All the searches above match author names, titles and years. You can also address single fields:
author:glasersfeld title:reality
shows publications von Glasersfeld wrote on reality;
abstract:second-order
searches all abstracts for "second-order";
editor:Watzlawick
finds all books edited by Watzlawick.
Note there is no space after the colon.
Attention: Words of three letters and less are ignored.
"Not one, not two"
will return no result although there is
Varela's paper
of this title.
Foerster H. von (1991) Through the Eyes of the Other. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and Reflexivity. Sage Publications, London: 63–75. https://cepa.info/1729
Foerster H. von
(
1991
)
Through the Eyes of the Other.
In: Steier F. (ed.)
Research and Reflexivity
. Sage Publications, London: 63–75.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/1729
Copy Ref
Gergen K. J. & Gergen M. M. (1991) Toward reflexive methodologies. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. Sage Publications, London: 76–95. https://cepa.info/2752
Gergen K. J.
&
Gergen M. M.
(
1991
)
Toward reflexive methodologies.
In: Steier F. (ed.)
Research and reflexivity
. Sage Publications, London: 76–95.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/2752
Copy Ref
Excerpt:
Are we to dismantle the scientific apparatus, declaring all attempts at ‘objective’, ‘authoritative’ knowledge to be fatuous? Are we to conclude that because we are each locked into our subjectivities we cannot even be certain that there is a ‘world out there’, or that we are truly communicating with other persons? Is there nothing left but to reflect on our own subjectivities, and then to reflect upon the reflection in an infinitude of self-reflexive iterations? These are all dolorous conclusions, indeed, and one would scarcely wish to pursue lines of thought for which these are the inevitable consequences. However, the consequences of obliterating the subject-object dichotomy largely depend on how we understand or interpret the problem. It is our view that if a social constructionist view is taken toward the issues, none of the above conclusions need follow. On the contrary, new vistas of research are opened for exploration.
Glasersfeld E. von (1991) Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. Sage, London: 12–29. https://cepa.info/1420
Glasersfeld E. von
(
1991
)
Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position.
In: Steier F. (ed.)
Research and reflexivity
. Sage, London: 12–29.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/1420
Copy Ref
Like any apparently novel approach to the basic epistemological problems of “knowledge”, the constructivist ideas that have spread in the last twenty years continue to generate a host of negative as well as a few positive reactions. In this chapter I shall focus on some aspects of Radical Constructivism, as distinct from “trivial” constructivisms, and try to show that the major objections that have been raised against it are due to gross misinterpretation and turn out to be vacuous once the position is made a little clearer.
Key words:
philosophy
,
radical constructivism
Maturana H. R. (1991) Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. Sage, Beverly Hills: 30–52.
Maturana H. R.
(
1991
)
Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations.
In: Steier F. (ed.)
Research and reflexivity
. Sage, Beverly Hills: 30–52.
Copy Ref
Republication of
Maturana H. R. (1990) Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations
Ravn I. (1991) What should guide reality construction? In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. Sage Publications, London: 96–114. https://cepa.info/2753
Ravn I.
(
1991
)
What should guide reality construction?
In: Steier F. (ed.)
Research and reflexivity
. Sage Publications, London: 96–114.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/2753
Copy Ref
Excerpt:
What should guide reality construction? If we are not forced to reproduce the given social reality, what alternative realities should we try to construct – what economic institutions, what foreign policies, what roles for the sexes, what schooling, what care for the sick? In this chapter I want to propose a model that includes both sides of the coin: the liberation side emphasized by the constructivist writers, and the commitment side under-emphasized by them. These two aspects of the good life will be combined into a simple model that describes some common ethical positions (relativism and absolutism) as distorted or degenerate cases of an ideal case. This model is offered as a framework for a discussion of the values problem in constructivism, particularly in social research from a constructivist approach.
Steier F. (1991) Introduction: Research as self-reflexivity, self-reflexivity as social process. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. Sage, London: 1–11.
Steier F.
(
1991
)
Introduction: Research as self-reflexivity, self-reflexivity as social process.
In: Steier F. (ed.)
Research and reflexivity
. Sage, London: 1–11.
Copy Ref
Steier F. (1991) Reflexivity and methodology: An ecological constructionism. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and Reflexivity. Sage Publications: 163–185.
Steier F.
(
1991
)
Reflexivity and methodology: An ecological constructionism.
In: Steier F. (ed.)
Research and Reflexivity
. Sage Publications: 163–185.
Copy Ref
Export result page as:
CF Format
·
APA
·
BibTex
·
EndNote
·
Harvard
·
MLA
·
Nature
·
RIS
·
Science
Please provide us with your
feedback/evaluation/suggestions