Toggle navigation
CEPA.INFO
FAQ
BROWSE
Authors
Constructivist Approaches
Background Disciplines
Reading Lists
Latest Fulltext Additions
LOGIN
Journal
Semiotica
Publications Found:
24
·
Show All Abstracts
·
Highlight Matches
Search CEPA
» Help with Search
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f��������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f���������������������������B
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f????��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f????��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2F�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������E
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2F????������������������������������������������������������������������������������?��������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f��������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f��������������������������B
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2F
By default, Find returns all publications that contain the words in the surnames of their author, in their titles, or in their years. For example,
Maturana
finds all publications authored by Maturana and publications that have "Maturana" in their title
Maturana 1974
finds all publications authored by Maturana in 1974
You can directly search for a reference by copy-pasting it. For example,
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Jean Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology
Unless a word (or phrase) if prefixed with a minus (-) it must be present in all results. Examples:
Glasersfeld Varela
shows all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld and Francisco Varela wrote together.
Glasersfeld "Jean Piaget"
finds all publications with
Glasersfeld
and
Jean Piaget
in it.
Prefix with
-
to indicate that this word must not be present in any result:
cognition -biology
will find entries that have
cognition
in the title but not
biology
.
Enter the surname of an author and a year to find all publications the author wrote in that year:
Glasersfeld 1995
presents all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld published in 1995.
Use
*
to match any characters:
constructivis*
matches constructivism and constructivist.
Enclose phrases between double quotes
"
to force phrase search:
"biology of cognition"
lists only the publications containing this phrase. Without the double quotes it will return all publications containing "biology" and all publications containing "cognition".
All the searches above match author names, titles and years. You can also address single fields:
author:glasersfeld title:reality
shows publications von Glasersfeld wrote on reality;
abstract:second-order
searches all abstracts for "second-order";
editor:Watzlawick
finds all books edited by Watzlawick.
Note there is no space after the colon.
Attention: Words of three letters and less are ignored.
"Not one, not two"
will return no result although there is
Varela's paper
of this title.
Anderson M., Deely J., Krampen M., Ransdell J., Sebeok T. A. & von Uexküll T. (1984) A semiotic perspective on the sciences: Steps toward a new paradigm. Semiotica 52(1/2): 7–47.
Anderson M.
,
Deely J.
,
Krampen M.
,
Ransdell J.
,
Sebeok T. A.
&
von Uexküll T.
(
1984
)
A semiotic perspective on the sciences: Steps toward a new paradigm
.
Semiotica
52(1/2): 7–47.
Copy Citation
Semiotics has itself thrived in a generative atmosphere of specialization and synthesis. Now, in an expanding intellectual universe, we converge with several other strains of scholarship. In this brief paper, we not only acknowledge this convergence and complementarity, but actively welcome the emerging rapprochement, which we interpret as representing a radical shift in scientific paradigm. This conceptual revolution transcends a dichotomous Cartesian, analytic view of the world, in the direction of a view embracing the whole, respecting complexity, and fostering synthesis.
Key words:
natural selection
,
dissipative structure
,
human language
,
annual international conference
,
competitive unit.
Bopry J. (2007) The give and take between semiotics and second-order cybernetics. Semiotica 164(1/4): 31–51. https://cepa.info/4150
Bopry J.
(
2007
)
The give and take between semiotics and second-order cybernetics
.
Semiotica
164(1/4): 31–51.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/4150
Copy Citation
In this paper, I describe what I consider to be some of the similarities between semiotics and second-order cybernetics. Particular attention is paid to the importance of interpretation and recursion in both fields. A distinction is made between the concept of representation in representational realism and representation as the stand-for relationship. Two models derived from cybernetic theory, ‘a recursive theory of communication’ and ‘levels of experience, ’ are discussed from a semiotic perspective and possible educational implications are described
Key words:
semiotics
,
cybernetics
,
second-order cybernetics
,
systems
,
autopoiesis enaction
,
communication theory.
Brier S. (1999) Biosemiotics and the foundation of cybersemiotics: Reconceptualizing the insights of ethology, second-order cybernetics and Peirce’s semiotics in biosemiotics to create a non-Cartesian Information Science. Semiotica 127(1/4): 169–198.
Brier S.
(
1999
)
Biosemiotics and the foundation of cybersemiotics: Reconceptualizing the insights of ethology, second-order cybernetics and Peirce’s semiotics in biosemiotics to create a non-Cartesian Information Science
.
Semiotica
127(1/4): 169–198.
Copy Citation
The present article will approach biosemiotics from two different interests and contexts. One is an interest in the development of the ethological project of Konrad Lorenz (1970–1971) and Niko Tinbergen (1973) into a truly non-mechanistic bio-psychological foundation of cognitive science. The other is an interest in finding a non-Cartesian foundation for the idea of a unified framework for information and communication science which – of course – must be consistent with the knowledge accumulated in cognitive science.
Brier S. (2001) Cybersemiotics and Umweltlehre. Semiotica 134(1/4): 779–814. https://cepa.info/4800
Brier S.
(
2001
)
Cybersemiotics and Umweltlehre
.
Semiotica
134(1/4): 779–814.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/4800
Copy Citation
Excerpt:
I want to show how important Uexküll’s Umwelt idea was for Konrad Lorenz ethology, how Maturana and Varela’s autopoietic concept of cognitive domain is an attempt to give a modern second order cybernetic and functionalistic development of important aspects of Uexküll’s idea with its biological theory of the observer in a general system’s evolutionary framework. Interestingly, Luhmann extended this theory into the social and linguistic domain, making it the foundation of a general theory of communication and cognition. But even this cybernetics theory of the living system’s cognition and communication do not have a true phenomenological theory of signification/semantics, which was immanent in Uexküll’s concept. Hence I work to unite second order cybernetics with Peirce’s pragmaticist semiotics within the area of biosemiotics, combining them with Wittgenstein’s language game theory and Lakoff s cognitive semantics in order to make a new transdisciplinary framework for information, cognitive, and communication sciences. I call this new framework Cybersemiotics.
Brier S. (2005) The construction of information and communication: A cybersemiotic reentry into Heinz von Foerster’s metaphysical construction of second-order cybernetics. Semiotica 154(1/4): 355–399.
Brier S.
(
2005
)
The construction of information and communication: A cybersemiotic reentry into Heinz von Foerster’s metaphysical construction of second-order cybernetics
.
Semiotica
154(1/4): 355–399.
Copy Citation
This article praises the development of second order cybernetics by von Foerster, Maturana, and Varela as an important step in deepening our un- derstanding of the bio-psychological foundation of the dynamics of information, cognition, and communication. Luhmann’s development of the theory into the realm of social communication is seen as a necessary and important move. The triple autopoietic differentiation between biological, psychologi- cal, and social-communicative autopoiesis and the introduction of a technical concept of meaning is central. Finally, the paper shows that second order cybernetics lacks explicit and ontological concepts of emotion, meaning, and a concept of signs. C. S. Peirce’s theory is introduced for this purpose. It is then shown, through Varela’s development of Spencer Brown’s ‘Laws of Form’ from a dual to a dynamic triadic categorical structure, that both theories are triadic and second order, and therefore can be fruitfully fused to a Cybersemiotics.
Emmeche C. (2001) Does a robot have an Umwelt? Reflections on the qualitative biosemiotics of Jakob von Uexküll. Semiotica 134(1/4): 653–693. https://cepa.info/4718
Emmeche C.
(
2001
)
Does a robot have an Umwelt? Reflections on the qualitative biosemiotics of Jakob von Uexküll
.
Semiotica
134(1/4): 653–693.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/4718
Copy Citation
I will investigate the plausibility of three theses: (1) The Umwelt theory of Jakob von Uexküll, even though his theoretical biology was often characterized as being thoroughly vitalist, can in the context of contemporary science, more adequately be interpreted as a branch of qualitative organicism in theoretical biology. Qualitative organicism is a position which claims, first, a kind of middle road position, that is, on the one hand, there are no mysterious or non-material vital powers in organisms (non-vitalism), but on the other hand, the characteristic properties of living beings cannot be fully accounted for by physics and chemistry because these properties are nonreducible emergent properties (emergentism); second, that some of these emergent pro- perties have an experiential, phenomenal, or subjective character which plays a major role in the dynamics of the living system. Modern bio- semiotics (inspired by C. S. Peirce and Jakob von Uexküll, instituted by Thomas A. Sebeok) is a kind of qualitative organicism. (2) This position sheds light on recent discussions in cognitive science, artificial life, and robotics about the nature of representation and cognition – indeed genuine semiotic questions as they deal with the role of information and signs for any system that has the property of being ‘animal-like,’ that is, systems that move by themselves and seem to be guided by a kind of entelechy or, in modern but shallow terms, a behavioral program. (3) Particularly, qualitative organicism allows us to approach the question of whether a robot can have an Umwelt in the sense that Jakob von Uexküll used the term (a subjectively experienced phenom- enal world) The eventuality of a positive answer to this question, i.e., a claim that a robot indeed can have an Umwelt, seems counterintuitive to the extent that a robot may be seen as – to use a bewildering word – an incarnation of the mechanical and reductionist world picture to which Jakob von Uexküll was so strongly opposed. But certain ideas and concepts may sometimes lead us to unexpected consequences, which threaten our cherished metaphysical assumptions, and we should try to face such questions with an open mind.
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) ”Because” and the concepts of causation. Semiotica 12(2): 129–144.
Glasersfeld E. von
(
1974
)
”Because” and the concepts of causation
.
Semiotica
12(2): 129–144.
Copy Citation
Key words:
language
,
semiotics
German translation: Chapter 4 in
Glasersfeld E. von (1987) Wissen, Sprache und Wirklichkeit
, Chapter 2 in
Glasersfeld E. von (1987) The construction of knowledge: Contributions to conceptual semantics
Kull K. (1998) On semiosis, Umwelt, and semiosphere. Semiotica 120(3/4): 299–310. https://cepa.info/3075
Kull K.
(
1998
)
On semiosis, Umwelt, and semiosphere
.
Semiotica
120(3/4): 299–310.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/3075
Copy Citation
Kull K. (2001) Jakob von Uexküll: An introduction. Semiotica 134(1/4): 1–59. https://cepa.info/2405
Kull K.
(
2001
)
Jakob von Uexküll: An introduction
.
Semiotica
134(1/4): 1–59.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/2405
Copy Citation
First paragraph:
The interest in Jakob von Uexküll in semiotics is obvious – he was a starter and pioneer of the semiotic approach in biology in thetwentieth century. The extension of semiotics from humanities, wheresemiotics has been centered during the period of its most intensive develo-pment, to the field of biology, has taken place gradually, with the mostdecisive steps taken onlyvery recently. The conclusion of this development is most fundamental – sign systems embrace all living systems, and the roots of semiotics lie in biology. On the other hand, Uexküll’s main ideawas to build up a biology which can handle the vital processes, and whichcan include the subject, the living self; or life itself, in the sense of Robert Rosen…
Lagerspetz K. Y. H. (2001) Jakob von Uexküll and the origins of cybernetics. Semiotica 134(1/4): 643–651.
Lagerspetz K. Y. H.
(
2001
)
Jakob von Uexküll and the origins of cybernetics
.
Semiotica
134(1/4): 643–651.
Copy Citation
Export result page as:
CF Format
·
APA
·
BibTex
·
EndNote
·
Harvard
·
MLA
·
Nature
·
RIS
·
Science
Page
1
2
3
Please provide us with your
feedback/evaluation/suggestions