de Lange F. P., Heilbron M. & Kok P. (2018) How do expectations shape perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22(9): 764–779.
de Lange F. P., Heilbron M. & Kok P.
(
2018)
How do expectations shape perception?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22(9): 764–779.
Perception and perceptual decision-making are strongly facilitated by prior knowledge about the probabilistic structure of the world. While the computational benefits of using prior expectation in perception are clear, there are myriad ways in which this computation can be realized. We review here recent advances in our understanding of the neural sources and targets of expectations in perception. Furthermore, we discuss Bayesian theories of perception that prescribe how an agent should integrate prior knowledge and sensory information, and investigate how current and future empirical data can inform and constrain computational frameworks that implement such probabilistic integration in perception.
Heilbron M. & Chait M. (2018) Great expectations: Is there evidence for predictive coding in auditory cortex? Neuroscience 389: 54–73. https://cepa.info/5799
Heilbron M. & Chait M.
(
2018)
Great expectations: Is there evidence for predictive coding in auditory cortex?
Neuroscience 389: 54–73.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/5799
Predictive coding is possibly one of the most influential, comprehensive, and controversial theories of neural function. While proponents praise its explanatory potential, critics object that key tenets of the theory are untested or even untestable. The present article critically examines existing evidence for predictive coding in the auditory modality. Specifically, we identify five key assumptions of the theory and evaluate each in the light of animal, human and modeling studies of auditory pattern processing. For the first two assumptions – that neural responses are shaped by expectations and that these expectations are hierarchically organized – animal and human studies provide compelling evidence. The anticipatory, predictive nature of these expectations also enjoys empirical support, especially from studies on unexpected stimulus omission. However, for the existence of separate error and prediction neurons, a key assumption of the theory, evidence is lacking. More work exists on the proposed oscillatory signatures of predictive coding, and on the relation between attention and precision. However, results on these latter two assumptions are mixed or contradictory. Looking to the future, more collaboration between human and animal studies, aided by model-based analyses will be needed to test specific assumptions and implementations of predictive coding – and, as such, help determine whether this popular grand theory can fulfill its expectations.