Author B. Janz
Janz B. B. (2019) Mysticism, Wonder, and Cognition. Constructivist Foundations 15(1): 23–24. https://cepa.info/6154
Janz B. B.
(
2019)
Mysticism, Wonder, and Cognition.
Constructivist Foundations 15(1): 23–24.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6154
Open peer commentary on the article “Constructivism and Mystical Experience” by Hugh Gash. Abstract: Gash leverages earlier discussions about the relationship between mysticism and its world, to argue that it is useful in thinking about the unexpected. I argue for a more nuanced understanding of surprise, which leads to asking about the place of questions and of events in cognition.
Reinerman-Jones L., Sollins B., Gallagher S. & Janz B. (2013) Neurophenomenology: An integrated approach to exploring awe and wonder. South African Journal of Philosophy 32(4): 295–309.
Reinerman-Jones L., Sollins B., Gallagher S. & Janz B.
(
2013)
Neurophenomenology: An integrated approach to exploring awe and wonder.
South African Journal of Philosophy 32(4): 295–309.
Astronauts often report experiences of awe and wonder while traveling in space. This paper addresses the question of whether awe and wonder can be scientifically investigated in a simulated space travel scenario using a neurophenomenological method. To answer this question, we created a mixed-reality simulation similar to the environment of the International Space Station. Portals opened to display simulations of Earth or Deep Space. However, the challenge still remained of how to best capture the resulting experience of participants. We could use psychological methods, neuroscientific methods or philosophical methods. Each of these approaches offer many benefits, but each is also limited. Neurophenomenology capitalises on and integrates all three methods. We employed questionnaires from psychology, electroencephalography, electrocardiography, and functional near-infrared spectroscopy from neuroscience, and a phenomenological interview technique from philosophy. This neurophenomenological method enabled extensive insight in experiencers and non-experiencers of awe and wonder (AW) in a simulated space scenario that otherwise would not have been possible. Traditional empirical analyses were completed, followed by individual differences analyses using interview transcriptions paired with physiological responses. Experiencers of AW showed differences in theta and beta activity throughout the brain compared to non-experiencers. Questionnaires indicated that non-experiencers of AW gave more positive responses of religious and spiritual practices than experiencers of AW. Interviews showed that awe and wonder were more likely to occur when watching the simulated Earth view instead of the Deep Space view. Our study is a successful example of neurophenomenology, a powerful and promising interdisciplinary approach for future studies of complex states of experience.
Export result page as:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·