Toggle navigation
CEPA.INFO
FAQ
BROWSE
Authors
Constructivist Approaches
Background Disciplines
Reading Lists
Latest Fulltext Additions
LOGIN
Search Results
Publications Found:
373
·
Show All Abstracts
·
Highlight Matches
Search CEPA
» Help with Search
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f���������������������������������������������������������������������������������B
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f������������������������������������������������������������������������������
fulltext:"Man, having within himself an imagined world of lines and numbers, operates in it with abstractions just as God in the universe, did with reality"
fulltext:"Man, having within himself an imagined world of lines and numbers, operates in it with abstractions just as God in the universe, did with reality"
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ORDER BY 3989
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????) ORDER BY 7543
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????' ORDER BY 4180
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????') ORDER BY 4953
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????' ORDER BY 7206
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ORDER BY 8748
By default, Find returns all publications that contain the words in the surnames of their author, in their titles, or in their years. For example,
Maturana
finds all publications authored by Maturana and publications that have "Maturana" in their title
Maturana 1974
finds all publications authored by Maturana in 1974
You can directly search for a reference by copy-pasting it. For example,
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Jean Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology
Unless a word (or phrase) if prefixed with a minus (-) it must be present in all results. Examples:
Glasersfeld Varela
shows all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld and Francisco Varela wrote together.
Glasersfeld "Jean Piaget"
finds all publications with
Glasersfeld
and
Jean Piaget
in it.
Prefix with
-
to indicate that this word must not be present in any result:
cognition -biology
will find entries that have
cognition
in the title but not
biology
.
Enter the surname of an author and a year to find all publications the author wrote in that year:
Glasersfeld 1995
presents all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld published in 1995.
Use
*
to match any characters:
constructivis*
matches constructivism and constructivist.
Enclose phrases between double quotes
"
to force phrase search:
"biology of cognition"
lists only the publications containing this phrase. Without the double quotes it will return all publications containing "biology" and all publications containing "cognition".
All the searches above match author names, titles and years. You can also address single fields:
author:glasersfeld title:reality
shows publications von Glasersfeld wrote on reality;
abstract:second-order
searches all abstracts for "second-order";
editor:Watzlawick
finds all books edited by Watzlawick.
Note there is no space after the colon.
Attention: Words of three letters and less are ignored.
"Not one, not two"
will return no result although there is
Varela's paper
of this title.
Agrawalla R. K. (2015) When Newton meets Heinz Von Foerster, complexity vanishes and simplicity reveals. Kybemetes 44(8/9): 1193–1206. https://cepa.info/6256
Agrawalla R. K.
(
2015
)
When Newton meets Heinz Von Foerster, complexity vanishes and simplicity reveals
.
Kybemetes
44(8/9): 1193–1206.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6256
Copy Citation
Purpose:
Complexity is the real beast that baffles everybody. Though there are increasing inter-disciplinary discussions on it, yet it is scantly explored. The purpose of this paper is to bring a new and unique dimension to the discourse assimilating the important ideas of two towering scientists of their time, Newton and Heinz von Foerster. In the tradition of Foersterian
second-order
cybernetics the paper attempts to build a bridge from a cause-effect thinking to a thinking oriented towards “understanding understanding” and in the process presents a model of “Cybernetics of Simplification” indicating a path to simplicity from complexity. Design/methodology/approach – The design of research in the paper is exploratory and the paper takes a multidisciplinary approach. The model presented in the paper builds on analytics and systemics at the same time.
Findings:
Simplicity can be seen in complex systems or situations if one can construct the reality (be that the current one that is being experienced or perceived or the future one that is being desired or envisaged) through the Cybernetics of Simplification model, establishing the effect-cause-and-effect and simultaneously following the frame of iterate and infer as a circular feedback loop; in the tradition of cybernetics of cybernetics. Research limitations/implications – It is yet to be applied.
Practical implications:
The model in the paper seems to have far reaching implications for complex problem solving and enhancing understanding of complex situations and systems. Social implications – The paper has potential to provoke new ideas and new thinking among scholars of complexity. Originality/value – The paper presents an original idea in terms of Cybernetics of Simplification building on the cybernetics of the self-observing system. The value lies in the unique perspective that it brings to the cybernetics discussions on complexity and simplification.
Key words:
causality
,
complexity
,
second-order cybernetics
,
cybernetics of simplification
,
self-observing system
,
simplification
Alroe H. F. (2016) Three Levels of Semiosis: Three Kinds of Kinds. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 23(2): 23–38. https://cepa.info/3353
Alroe H. F.
(
2016
)
Three Levels of Semiosis: Three Kinds of Kinds
.
Cybernetics & Human Knowing
23(2): 23–38.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/3353
Copy Citation
In philosophy, there is an as yet unresolved discussion on whether there are different kinds of kinds and what those kinds are. In particular, there is a distinction between indifferent kinds, which are unaffected by observation and representation, and interactive kinds, which respond to being studied in ways that alter the very kinds under study. This is in essence a discussion on ontologies and, I argue, more precisely about ontological levels. The discussion of kinds of kinds can be resolved by using a semiotic approach to ontological levels, building on the key semiotic concept of representation. There are three, and only three, levels of semiosis: nonor protosemiotic processes without representation, such as physical or causal processes, semiotic processes with representation, such as the processes of life and cognition, and
second-order
semiotic processes with representation of representation, such as self-awareness and self-reflexive communication. This leads to the distinction between not two, but three kinds of kinds: indifferent, adaptive and reflexive kinds, of which the last two hitherto have not been clearly distinguished.
Key words:
Peirce
,
biosemiotics
,
constructivist
,
natural kinds
,
ontological levels
,
representation
,
second-order cybernetics
,
semiotic levels
,
semiotic thresholds
Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2012) The paradox of scientific expertise: A perspectivist approach to knowledge asymmetries. Fachsprache - International Journal of Specialized Communication XXXIV(3–4): 152–167. https://cepa.info/462
Alrøe H. F.
&
Noe E.
(
2012
)
The paradox of scientific expertise: A perspectivist approach to knowledge asymmetries
.
Fachsprache - International Journal of Specialized Communication
XXXIV(3–4): 152–167.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/462
Copy Citation
The paradox of scientific expertise is that the growth of science leads to a fragmentation of scientific expertise. To resolve this paradox, this paper probes three hypotheses: 1) All scientific knowledge is perspectival. 2) The perspectival structure of science leads to specific forms of knowledge asymmetries. 3) Such perspectival knowledge asymmetries must be handled through
second order
perspectives. We substantiate these hypotheses on the basis of a perspectivist philosophy of science grounded in Peircean semiotics and autopoietic systems theory. Perspectivism is an important elaboration of constructivist approaches to help overcome problems in cross-disciplinary collaboration and use of science, and thereby make society better able to solve complex, real-world problems.
Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2014) Authors’ Response: A Perspectivist View on the Perspectivist View of Interdisciplinary Science. Constructivist Foundations 10(1): 88–95. https://cepa.info/1172
Alrøe H. F.
&
Noe E.
(
2014
)
Authors’ Response: A Perspectivist View on the Perspectivist View of Interdisciplinary Science
.
Constructivist Foundations
10(1): 88–95.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/1172
Copy Citation
Upshot:
In our response we focus on five questions that point to important common themes in the commentaries: why start in wicked problems, what kind of system is a scientific perspective, what is the nature of
second-order
research processes, what does this mean for understanding interdisciplinary work, and how may polyocular research help make real-world decisions.
Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2014) Second-Order Science of Interdisciplinary Research: A Polyocular Framework for Wicked Problems. Constructivist Foundations 10(1): 65–76. https://cepa.info/1166
Alrøe H. F.
&
Noe E.
(
2014
)
Second-Order
Science of Interdisciplinary Research: A Polyocular Framework for Wicked Problems
.
Constructivist Foundations
10(1): 65–76.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/1166
Copy Citation
Context:
The problems that are most in need of interdisciplinary collaboration are “wicked problems,” such as food crises, climate change mitigation, and sustainable development, with many relevant aspects, disagreement on what the problem is, and contradicting solutions. Such complex problems both require and challenge interdisciplinarity.
Problem:
The conventional methods of interdisciplinary research fall short in the case of wicked problems because they remain first-order science. Our aim is to present workable methods and research designs for doing
second-order
science in domains where there are many different scientific knowledges on any complex problem.
Method:
We synthesize and elaborate a framework for
second-order
science in interdisciplinary research based on a number of earlier publications, experiences from large interdisciplinary research projects, and a perspectivist theory of science.
Results:
The
second-order
polyocular framework for interdisciplinary research is characterized by five principles.
Second-order
science of interdisciplinary research must: 1. draw on the observations of first-order perspectives, 2. address a shared dynamical object, 3. establish a shared problem, 4. rely on first-order perspectives to see themselves as perspectives, and 5. be based on other rules than first-order research.
Implications:
The perspectivist insights of
second-order
science provide a new way of understanding interdisciplinary research that leads to new polyocular methods and research designs. It also points to more reflexive ways of dealing with scientific expertise in democratic processes. The main challenge is that this is a paradigmatic shift, which demands that the involved disciplines, at least to some degree, subscribe to a perspectivist view.
Constructivist content:
Our perspectivist approach to science is based on the
second-order
cybernetics and systems theories of von Foerster, Maruyama, Maturana & Varela, and Luhmann, coupled with embodied theories of cognition and semiotics as a general theory of meaning from von Uexküll and Peirce.
Key words:
Perspectivism
,
semiotics
,
complex phenomena
,
social systems theory
,
differentiation of science
,
perspectival knowledge asymmetries.
Andrew A. M. (2005) Artificial neural nets and BCL. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 33–39.
Andrew A. M.
(
2005
)
Artificial neural nets and BCL
.
Kybernetes
34(1/2): 33–39.
Copy Citation
Purpose:
Attention is drawn to a principle of “significance feedback” in neural nets that was devised in the encouraging ambience of the Biological Computer Laboratory and is arguably fundamental to much of the subsequent practical application of artificial neural nets. Design/methodology/approach – The background against which the innovation was made is reviewed, as well as subsequent developments. It is emphasised that Heinz von Foerster and BCL made important contributions prior to their focus on
second-order
cybernetics.
Findings:
The version of “significance feedback” denoted by “backpropagation of error” has found numerous applications, but in a restricted field, and the relevance to biology is uncertain.
Practical implications:
Ways in which the principle might be extended are discussed, including attention to structural changes in networks, and extension of the field of application to include conceptual processing. Originality/value – The original work was 40 years ago, but indications are given of questions that are still unanswered and avenues yet to be explored, some of them indicated by reference to intelligence as “fractal.”
Key words:
cybernetics
,
neural nets
,
learning.
Arnellos A. & Spyrou T. (2008) Emergence and Downward Causation in Contemporary Artificial Agents: Implications for their Autonomy and Some Design Guidelines. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 15(3–4): 15–41. https://cepa.info/3298
Arnellos A.
&
Spyrou T.
(
2008
)
Emergence and Downward Causation in Contemporary Artificial Agents: Implications for their Autonomy and Some Design Guidelines
.
Cybernetics & Human Knowing
15(3–4): 15–41.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/3298
Copy Citation
Contemporary research in artificial environments has marked the need for autonomy in artificial agents. Autonomy has many interpretations in terms of the field within which it is being used and analyzed, but the majority of the researchers in artificial environments are arguing in favor of a strong and life-like notion of autonomy. Departing from this point the main aim of this paper is to examine the possibility of the emergence of autonomy in contemporary artificial agents. The theoretical findings of research in the areas of living and cognitive systems, suggests that the study of autonomous agents should adopt a systemic and emergent perspective for the analysis of the evolutionary development of the notions/properties of autonomy, functionality, intentionality and meaning, as the fundamental and characteristic properties of a natural agent. An analytic indication of the functional emergence of these concepts and properties is provided, based on the characteristics of the more general systemic framework of
second-order
cybernetic and of the interactivist framework. The notion of emergence is a key concept in such an analysis which in turn provides the ground for the theoretical evaluation of the autonomy of contemporary artificial agents with respect to the functional emergence of their capacities. The fundamental problems for the emergence of genuine autonomy in artificial agents are critically discussed and some design guidelines are provided.
Key words:
Agency
,
Autonomy
,
Downward Causation
,
Functionality
,
Intentionality
,
Meaning
,
Normativity
,
Self-organization
,
emergence
Arnold-Cathalifaud M. & Thumala-Dockendorff D. (2016) To What Extent Can Second-Order Cybernetics Be a Foundation for Psychology? Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 520–521. https://cepa.info/2864
Arnold-Cathalifaud M.
&
Thumala-Dockendorff D.
(
2016
)
To What Extent Can
Second-Order
Cybernetics Be a Foundation for Psychology?
.
Constructivist Foundations
11(3): 520–521.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/2864
Copy Citation
Open peer commentary on the article “Cybernetic Foundations for Psychology” by Bernard Scott.
Upshot:
Scott’s proposal is well-founded and opens interesting possibilities. We selected some critical aspects of his argumentation and discuss them in the context of the constructivist perspective. We highlight as Scott’s “blind spot” his statement - presented without further argument - of the need for a conceptual and theoretical unification of psychology from the perspective of
second-order
cybernetics. We find this especially worrisome as it is based on only one version of cybernetics.
Ashby M. (2013) Cybernetics of cybernetics competition the winning entry: Structure, environment, purpose, and a grand challenge for the ASC. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 20(1–2): 113–123. https://cepa.info/3579
Ashby M.
(
2013
)
Cybernetics of cybernetics competition the winning entry: Structure, environment, purpose, and a grand challenge for the ASC
.
Cybernetics & Human Knowing
20(1–2): 113–123.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/3579
Copy Citation
This proposal is based on a view of the ASC as a system that consists of an organism that exists in, and operates purposefully on an environment. We propose changes to the organism and its environment. Our first proposal changes the structure of the ASC organism to make it explicitly and functionally
second-order
cybernetic. The second proposal changes the environment of influence of the ASC organism.
Atkinson B. J. & Heath A. W. (1990) Further thoughts on second-order family therapy – This time it’s personal. Family Process 29: 145–155. https://cepa.info/4097
Atkinson B. J.
&
Heath A. W.
(
1990
)
Further thoughts on
second-order
family therapy – This time it’s personal
.
Family Process
29: 145–155.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/4097
Copy Citation
A series of articles has recently appeared in which implications of
second-order
cybernetics for the practice of family therapy have been discussed. In this article, we attempt to advance the discussion by addressing ideas that we think have not been adequately emphasized thus far. Specifically proposed are ideas about conditions that might facilitate the emergence of consciously pragmatic strategy informed by the kind of systemic wisdom that delicately balances natural systems without the benefit of human planning. It is argued that a shift in the personal habits of knowing and acting that typically organize individual human experience is required. After attempting to specify what this shift might involve, implications of these ideas for the practice of family therapy and for human action in general are discussed.
Export result page as:
CF Format
·
APA
·
BibTex
·
EndNote
·
Harvard
·
MLA
·
Nature
·
RIS
·
Science
Page
1
2
...
37
38
Please provide us with your
feedback/evaluation/suggestions