Apostel L. (1977) Le rôle du sujet dans la connaissance. With a response by Jean Piaget. In: Inhelder B., Garcia R. & Voneche J. (eds.) Epistémologie génétique et équilibration. Delachaux et Niestle, Neuchatel: 61–66. https://cepa.info/4252
Apostel L.
(
1977)
Le rôle du sujet dans la connaissance. With a response by Jean Piaget.
In: Inhelder B., Garcia R. & Voneche J. (eds.) Epistémologie génétique et équilibration. Delachaux et Niestle, Neuchatel: 61–66.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/4252
Foerster H. von (1977) Formalisation de Certains Aspects de l’Équilibration de Structures Cognitives. In: Inhelder B., Garcias R. & Voneche J. (eds.) Epistémologie Génétique et Équilibration. Delachaux et Niestle, Neuchatel: 76–89.
Foerster H. von
(
1977)
Formalisation de Certains Aspects de l’Équilibration de Structures Cognitives.
In: Inhelder B., Garcias R. & Voneche J. (eds.) Epistémologie Génétique et Équilibration. Delachaux et Niestle, Neuchatel: 76–89.
Foerster H. von (1977) The curious behavior of complex systems: Lessons from biology. In: Linstone H. A. & Simmonds W. H. (eds.) Future research. Addison-Wesley, Reading: 104–113.
Foerster H. von
(
1977)
The curious behavior of complex systems: Lessons from biology.
In: Linstone H. A. & Simmonds W. H. (eds.) Future research. Addison-Wesley, Reading: 104–113.
Gibson J. J. (1977) The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R. & Bransford J. (eds.) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 67–82.
Gibson J. J.
(
1977)
The theory of affordances.
In: Shaw R. & Bransford J. (eds.) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 67–82.
Gibson J. J. (1977) The theory of affordances In: Shaw R. In: Bransford J. (ed.) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 67–82.
Gibson J. J.
(
1977)
The theory of affordances In: Shaw R.
In: Bransford J. (ed.) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 67–82.
Glasersfeld E. von (1977) Comunicare con un scimpanze. In: Istituto di Psicologia CNR (ed.) Problemi attuali di psicologia. Bulzoni, Rome: 145–158.
Glasersfeld E. von
(
1977)
Comunicare con un scimpanze.
In: Istituto di Psicologia CNR (ed.) Problemi attuali di psicologia. Bulzoni, Rome: 145–158.
Glasersfeld E. von (1977) Linguistic communication: Theory and definition. In: Rumbaugh D. M. (ed.) Language learning by a chimpanzee. Academic Press, New York: 55–71. https://cepa.info/1335
Glasersfeld E. von
(
1977)
Linguistic communication: Theory and definition.
In: Rumbaugh D. M. (ed.) Language learning by a chimpanzee. Academic Press, New York: 55–71.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/1335
Excerpt: I shall try to formulate criterial characteristics of the phenomenon we have in mind when we use the term “language,” and then to suggest how those criteria might be applied to determine whether or not a given organism is using a linguistic system of communication. I would like to point out that, although language also plays an important role in the cognitive development and functioning of individual organisms, we shall be concerned here only with its communicatory function.
Glasersfeld E. von (1977) Russian essays on lexical semantics (Book review). American Journal of Computational Linguistics 14(2): 16–33.
Glasersfeld E. von
(
1977)
Russian essays on lexical semantics (Book review).
American Journal of Computational Linguistics 14(2): 16–33.
Glasersfeld E. von (1977) Seen from the outside. Contact Quarterly II(3): 23.
Glasersfeld E. von
(
1977)
Seen from the outside.
Contact Quarterly II(3): 23.
Glasersfeld E. von (1977) The Yerkish language and its automatic parser. In: Rumbaugh D. M. (ed.) Language learning by a chimpanzee. Academic Press, New York: 91–130. https://cepa.info/1336
Glasersfeld E. von
(
1977)
The Yerkish language and its automatic parser.
In: Rumbaugh D. M. (ed.) Language learning by a chimpanzee. Academic Press, New York: 91–130.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/1336
Excerpt: Yerkish is an artificial language that was designed for the specific purpose of exploring the linguistic potential of nonhuman primates. It was designed under a number of constraints, both theoretical and practical. In what follows I shall try to show which aspects of the language were determined by these initial practical constraints and which by the theory underlying its design. Since the language was created at the same time as the computer system that monitors all the communication events for which it is used, there will inevitably be some overlap in the description of the language and that of the automatic sentence analyzer, or parser. Also, since the grammar we are using is a correlational grammar, i.e., one that takes into account the semantic aspects of combinatorial patterns (unlike traditional systems of grammar, which tend to consider syntactic structures quite apart from semantics), the description of the lexicon and that of the grammar will have to merge at several points. Nevertheless, this chapter will be articulated into relatively independent sections dealing with the word signs (lexigrams), the meaning and grammatical classification of word signs, combinatorial patterns, the parsing system, and, finally, a brief application of the concept of grammatical ity to a sample of Lana’s output.