Toggle navigation
CEPA.INFO
FAQ
BROWSE
Authors
Constructivist Approaches
Background Disciplines
Reading Lists
Latest Fulltext Additions
LOGIN
Search Results
Publications Found:
153
·
Show All Abstracts
·
Highlight Matches
Search CEPA
» Help with Search
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ORDER BY 3989
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????) ORDER BY 7543
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????' ORDER BY 4180
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????') ORDER BY 4953
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????' ORDER BY 7206
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ORDER BY 8748
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������B
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ORDER BY 3989#
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????' ORDER BY 4180#
By default, Find returns all publications that contain the words in the surnames of their author, in their titles, or in their years. For example,
Maturana
finds all publications authored by Maturana and publications that have "Maturana" in their title
Maturana 1974
finds all publications authored by Maturana in 1974
You can directly search for a reference by copy-pasting it. For example,
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Jean Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology
Unless a word (or phrase) if prefixed with a minus (-) it must be present in all results. Examples:
Glasersfeld Varela
shows all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld and Francisco Varela wrote together.
Glasersfeld "Jean Piaget"
finds all publications with
Glasersfeld
and
Jean Piaget
in it.
Prefix with
-
to indicate that this word must not be present in any result:
cognition -biology
will find entries that have
cognition
in the title but not
biology
.
Enter the surname of an author and a year to find all publications the author wrote in that year:
Glasersfeld 1995
presents all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld published in 1995.
Use
*
to match any characters:
constructivis*
matches constructivism and constructivist.
Enclose phrases between double quotes
"
to force phrase search:
"biology of cognition"
lists only the publications containing this phrase. Without the double quotes it will return all publications containing "biology" and all publications containing "cognition".
All the searches above match author names, titles and years. You can also address single fields:
author:glasersfeld title:reality
shows publications von Glasersfeld wrote on reality;
abstract:second-order
searches all abstracts for "second-order";
editor:Watzlawick
finds all books edited by Watzlawick.
Note there is no space after the colon.
Attention: Words of three letters and less are ignored.
"Not one, not two"
will return no result although there is
Varela's paper
of this title.
Ackermann E. K. (1996) Perspective-taking and object construction: Two keys to learning. In: Kafai J. & Resnick M. (eds.) Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ: 25–37.
Ackermann E. K.
(
1996
)
Perspective-taking and object construction: Two keys to learning
.
In: Kafai J. & Resnick M. (eds.)
Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world
. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ: 25–37.
Copy Citation
Piaget defines intelligence as adaptation, or the ability to maintain a balance between stability and change, or, in his own words, between assimilation and accommodation. When people assimilate the world to their current knowledge, they impose their order upon things. This momentary closure is useful to build “invariants” that lend existence to the world, independent of immediate interaction. In accommodation, people become one with the object of attention. This may lead to momentary loss of control, since fusion loosens boundaries, but allows for change. I choose the domain of perspective-taking to illustrate how this alternation between assimilation and accommodation punctuate individuals’ interactions with the world. I show that the ability to move away from one’s own standpoint, and to take on another person’s view, requires the construction of cognitive invariants: a recasting of the world’s stabilities that transcends any given viewpoint. I conclude that separation is a necessary step toward the construction of a deeper understanding, and that adopting a “god’s eyes view” is by no means contrary to situating one’s one stance in the world.
Anthony G. (1996) Active learning in a constructivist framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics 31(4): 349–369. https://cepa.info/5221
Anthony G.
(
1996
)
Active learning in a constructivist framework
.
Educational Studies in Mathematics
31(4): 349–369.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/5221
Copy Citation
An important tenet of constructivism is that learning is an idiosyncratic, active and evolving process. Active learning, operationalized by cognitive, metacognitive, affective and resource management learning strategies, is necessary for students to effectively cope with the high level of demands placed on the learner in a constructivist learning environment. Case studies of two students detail contrasting passive and active learning behaviours. Examples of their strategic learning behaviours illustrate that having students involved in activities such as discussions, question answering, and seatwork problems does not automatically guarantee successful knowledge construction. The nature of students’ metacognitive knowledge and the quality of their learning strategies are seen to be critical factors in successful learning outcomes.
Key words:
resource management
,
learning environment
,
active learning
,
learning outcome
,
learning strategy.
Appleton K. & Asoko H. (1996) A case study of a teacher’s progress toward using a constructivist view of learning to inform teaching in elementary science. Science Education 80(2): 165–180. https://cepa.info/5900
Appleton K.
&
Asoko H.
(
1996
)
A case study of a teacher’s progress toward using a constructivist view of learning to inform teaching in elementary science
.
Science Education
80(2): 165–180.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/5900
Copy Citation
For some years, there have been in‐service efforts to help teachers become familiar with constructivist ideas about learning, and to apply them in their science teaching. This study is a vignette of one teacher’s science teaching some time after such an in‐service activity. It explores the ways in which the teacher implemented his perceptions of constructivist ideas about learning in his teaching of a topic. The extent to which the teacher used teaching principles based on constructivism was influenced by his views of science and of learning, how he usually planned his teaching, and his confidence in his own understanding of the topic. Features of the teaching which reflect a constructivist view of learning are discussed and some problems are identified. We conclude with some reflections about in‐service programs within a constructivist framework.
Ashworth P. D. (1996) Presuppose nothing! The suspension of assumptions in phenomenological psychological methodology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 27(1): 1–25. https://cepa.info/7446
Ashworth P. D.
(
1996
)
Presuppose nothing! The suspension of assumptions in phenomenological psychological methodology
.
Journal of Phenomenological Psychology
27(1): 1–25.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7446
Copy Citation
Historically, the suspension of presuppositions (the epoché, or bracketing) arose as part of the philosophical procedure of the transcendental reduction which, Husserl taught, led to the distinct realm of phenomenological research: pure consciousness. With such an origin, it may seem surprising that bracketing remains a methodological concept of modern phenomenological psychology, in which the focus is on the life-world. Such a focus of investigation is, on the face of it, incompatible with transcendental idealism. \\The gap was bridged largely by Merleau-Ponty, who found it possible to interpret Husserl’s later work in an existentialist way, and thus enabled the process of bracketing to refer, not to a turning away from the world and a concentration on detached consciousness, but to the resolve to set aside theories, research presuppositions, ready-made interpretations, etc., in order to reveal engaged, lived experience. \\This paper outlines the history of the suspension of presuppositions and discusses the scope and limitations of bracketing in its new sense within existential phenomenology. The emphasis is on research practice and on the phenomenological quest for entry into the life-world of the research participant. It is argued that the bracketing of presuppositions throughout the process of research should be a cardinal feature of phenomenological psychology. \\Of equal importance is the investigator’s sensitive awareness that the investigation of the life-world and the phenomena which appear within it is a thoroughly interpersonal process, necessarily entailing the taken-for-granted assumptions implicit in all social interaction. These presuppositions are not open to bracketing.
Baecker D. (1996) A note on composition. Systems Research 13(3): 195–204. https://cepa.info/2929
Baecker D.
(
1996
)
A note on composition
.
Systems Research
13(3): 195–204.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/2929
Copy Citation
It is characteristic of Heinz von Foerster’s approach to the cybernetics of cybernetics that it combines a sense of tight reasoning with the acknowledgment of fundamental ignorance. The article attempts to uncover an epistemological relationship between the reasoning and the ignorance. The relationship is provided for by a razor which reads: what can be described in relation to its composition, is described in vain in relation to its substance. The razor asks for second-order terms instead of first-order terms, or for ontogenetics instead of ontology.
Key words:
closure
,
communication
,
composition
,
epistemology
Baily D. H. (1996) Constructivism and multimedia: Theory and application; Innovation and transformation. International Journal of Instructional Media 23(2): 161–166.
Baily D. H.
(
1996
)
Constructivism and multimedia: Theory and application; Innovation and transformation
.
International Journal of Instructional Media
23(2): 161–166.
Copy Citation
Discusses the correspondence between constructivist design and the creation of multimedia projects. Argues that if students and teachers are exposed to multimedia presentations and are offered opportunities to participate in workshops or classroom activities using multimedia technology, those with interest will use it to demonstrate content area knowledge, generating further interest among faculty and students.
Key words:
active learning
,
constructivism (learning)
,
educational technology
,
educational theories
,
multimedia
,
multimedia materials
,
student motivation
,
student projects
,
technological literacy.
Barnes G. (1996) What you get is what you see: A contribution to an epistemology of imagination. Systems Research 13(3): 215–228. https://cepa.info/3755
Barnes G.
(
1996
)
What you get is what you see: A contribution to an epistemology of imagination
.
Systems Research
13(3): 215–228.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/3755
Copy Citation
How may mental activity be conceptualized within the context of the epistemology engendered by cybernetics, and how may that epistemology account for imagination? I argue for an epistemology of imagination that both distinguishes imagination, understanding and interpretation, and unites all three concepts in a dialogical circle of ideas. The processes of distinguishing these concepts (and the processes that give rise to and describe mental activities) are dialogical processes. As dialogical, they fall within the scope of Heinz von Foerster’s work on second-order cybernetics.
Key words:
Cybernetics
,
second-order cybernetics
,
epistemology
,
imagination
,
understanding
,
interpretation
,
von Foerster.
Barsch A. (1996) Angst vor einem neuen Paradigma? Replik auf Ralph Gehrkes “Was leistet der Radikale Konstruktivismus für die Literaturgeschichte? ” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 70: 313–321.
Barsch A.
(
1996
)
Angst vor einem neuen Paradigma? Replik auf Ralph Gehrkes “Was leistet der Radikale Konstruktivismus für die Literaturgeschichte?
.
” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte
70: 313–321.
Copy Citation
Barsch A. (1996) Angst vor einem neuen Paradigma? Replik auf Ralph Gehrkes “Was leistet der Radikale Konstruktivismus für die Literaturwissenschaft? ” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 70(2): 313–321. https://cepa.info/3917
Barsch A.
(
1996
)
Angst vor einem neuen Paradigma? Replik auf Ralph Gehrkes “Was leistet der Radikale Konstruktivismus für die Literaturwissenschaft?
.
” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte
70(2): 313–321.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/3917
Copy Citation
Ralph Gehrke’s critique of an empirical study of literature reveals misunderstandings and implications which first need to be questioned. The discussion in this paper focuses an the following aspects: the constitution of the domain of literary scholarship, of concepts of literature, methods of analyzing, and questions of the self-definition of literary scholars in a media-dominated era.
Bliss J. (1996) Piaget und Vygotsky: Ihre Bedeutung für das Lehren und Lernen der Naturwissenschaften. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 2(3): 3–16.
Bliss J.
(
1996
)
Piaget und Vygotsky: Ihre Bedeutung für das Lehren und Lernen der Naturwissenschaften
.
Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften
2(3): 3–16.
Copy Citation
Wie wir über das Lernen und Lehren denken, ist vor allem in den Naturwissenschaften seit zwei Jahrzehnten vom Konstruktivismus beeinflußt worden, einer Bewegung, die Piaget viel zu verdanken hat. In jüngerer Zeit haben auch die Arbeiten von Vygotsky, mit ihrer stärkeren Fokussierung auf den Lehrer, die Aufmerksamkeit der Didaktiker auf sich gelenkt. Es ist eine verbreitete Ansicht, der jedoch widersprochen werden muß, Vygotsky habe Piaget als den maßgeblichen Theoretiker verdrängt. Beide sind für ein Verständnis des Lehrens und Lernens notwendig, ihre Ideen stehen nicht im Konflikt miteinander, sondern ergänzen sich. Die Autorin wird sich auf den naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht in der Schule konzentrieren, da es trotz der enormen Anstrengungen auf diesem Gebiet während der letzten 40 Jahre Kinder immer noch schwierig finden, die Naturwissenschaften zu erlernen.
Export result page as:
CF Format
·
APA
·
BibTex
·
EndNote
·
Harvard
·
MLA
·
Nature
·
RIS
·
Science
Page
1
2
...
15
16
Please provide us with your
feedback/evaluation/suggestions