Toggle navigation
CEPA.INFO
FAQ
BROWSE
Authors
Constructivist Approaches
Background Disciplines
Reading Lists
Latest Fulltext Additions
LOGIN
Search Results
Publications Found:
201
·
Show All Abstracts
·
Highlight Matches
Search CEPA
» Help with Search
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ORDER BY 3989
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????) ORDER BY 7543
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????' ORDER BY 4180
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????') ORDER BY 4953
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????' ORDER BY 7206
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ORDER BY 8748
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������B
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ORDER BY 3989#
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????' ORDER BY 4180#
By default, Find returns all publications that contain the words in the surnames of their author, in their titles, or in their years. For example,
Maturana
finds all publications authored by Maturana and publications that have "Maturana" in their title
Maturana 1974
finds all publications authored by Maturana in 1974
You can directly search for a reference by copy-pasting it. For example,
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Jean Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology
Unless a word (or phrase) if prefixed with a minus (-) it must be present in all results. Examples:
Glasersfeld Varela
shows all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld and Francisco Varela wrote together.
Glasersfeld "Jean Piaget"
finds all publications with
Glasersfeld
and
Jean Piaget
in it.
Prefix with
-
to indicate that this word must not be present in any result:
cognition -biology
will find entries that have
cognition
in the title but not
biology
.
Enter the surname of an author and a year to find all publications the author wrote in that year:
Glasersfeld 1995
presents all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld published in 1995.
Use
*
to match any characters:
constructivis*
matches constructivism and constructivist.
Enclose phrases between double quotes
"
to force phrase search:
"biology of cognition"
lists only the publications containing this phrase. Without the double quotes it will return all publications containing "biology" and all publications containing "cognition".
All the searches above match author names, titles and years. You can also address single fields:
author:glasersfeld title:reality
shows publications von Glasersfeld wrote on reality;
abstract:second-order
searches all abstracts for "second-order";
editor:Watzlawick
finds all books edited by Watzlawick.
Note there is no space after the colon.
Attention: Words of three letters and less are ignored.
"Not one, not two"
will return no result although there is
Varela's paper
of this title.
Abrahamson D., Nathan M. J., Williams-Pierce C., Walkington C., Ottmar E. R., Soto H. & Alibali M. W. (2020) The future of embodied design for mathematics teaching and learning. Frontiers in Education 5: 147. https://cepa.info/7086
Abrahamson D.
,
Nathan M. J.
,
Williams-Pierce C.
,
Walkington C.
,
Ottmar E. R.
,
Soto H.
&
Alibali M. W.
(
2020
)
The future of embodied design for mathematics teaching and learning
.
Frontiers in Education
5: 147.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7086
Copy Citation
A rising epistemological paradigm in the cognitive sciences – embodied cognition – has been stimulating innovative approaches, among educational researchers, to the design and analysis of STEM teaching and learning. The paradigm promotes theorizations of cognitive activity as grounded, or even constituted, in goal-oriented multimodal sensorimotor phenomenology. Conceptual learning, per these theories, could emanate from, or be triggered by, experiences of enacting or witnessing particular movement forms, even before these movements are explicitly signified as illustrating target content. Putting these theories to practice, new types of learning environments are being explored that utilize interactive technologies to initially foster student enactment of conceptually oriented movement forms and only then formalize these gestures and actions in disciplinary formats and language. In turn, new research instruments, such as multimodal learning analytics, now enable researchers to aggregate, integrate, model, and represent students’ physical movements, eye-gaze paths, and verbal–gestural utterance so as to track and evaluate emerging conceptual capacity. We – a cohort of cognitive scientists and design-based researchers of embodied mathematics – survey a set of empirically validated frameworks and principles for enhancing mathematics teaching and learning as dialogic multimodal activity, and we synthetize a set of principles for educational practice.
Agmon E. (2020) Deriving the bodily grounding of living beings with molecular autopoiesis. Adaptive Behavior 28(1): 35–36. https://cepa.info/6270
Agmon E.
(
2020
)
Deriving the bodily grounding of living beings with molecular autopoiesis
.
Adaptive Behavior
28(1): 35–36.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6270
Copy Citation
“Are living beings extended autopoietic systems? An embodied reply,” makes the case for grounding the autopoietic definition of living beings to the discrete bodies of organisms rather than to autopoietic systems that extend beyond the organisms into their environments. They attempt this grounding by amending a clause to the original formulation of autopoiesis that identifies living beings with their bodies, and then they explicitly define “bodies”. This commentary makes the case that bodily grounding can be derived from molecular autopoiesis by taking the molecular domain seriously, and no new amendment is required.
Key words:
autopoiesis
,
embodiment
,
organisms.
Apiola M.-V. & Sutinen E. (2020) Towards Constructivist Design of Artificial Intelligence: Perspectives and Ideas. Constructivist Foundations 16(1): 055–056. https://cepa.info/6812
Apiola M.-V.
&
Sutinen E.
(
2020
)
Towards Constructivist Design of Artificial Intelligence: Perspectives and Ideas
.
Constructivist Foundations
16(1): 055–056.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6812
Copy Citation
Open peer commentary on the article “Foresight Rather than Hindsight? Future State Maximization As a Computational Interpretation of Heinz von Foerster’s Ethical Imperative” by Hannes Hornischer, Simon Plakolb, Georg Jäger & Manfred Füllsack.
Abstract:
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to have a fundamental impact in our world and lives, a crucial need arises for integrating ethical and constructivist principles in the design of AI systems, and related computational thinking. We discuss aspects and examples of ethical and constructivist design of AI in the context of the target article, and especially in the domains of future-oriented ethical design and computing education.
Austin S. (2020) Inquiry About and Being with the Natural World in Education for Sustainable Development. Constructivist Foundations 16(1): 024–026. https://cepa.info/6805
Austin S.
(
2020
)
Inquiry About and Being with the Natural World in Education for Sustainable Development
.
Constructivist Foundations
16(1): 024–026.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6805
Copy Citation
Open peer commentary on the article “Constructivism, Fast Thinking, Heuristics and Sustainable Development” by Hugh Gash.
Abstract:
Understanding how best to educate for sustainability must be a priority in this time of environmental uncertainty. This commentary examines the role of inquiry-based learning in education for sustainability, and the importance of learning in relationship with a world that is lively and sentient.
Ayala D. C. (2020) Cohesiveness is not an adequate theory of general individuation and it does not account for living individuals. Adaptive Behavior 28(1): 31–32.
Ayala D. C.
(
2020
)
Cohesiveness is not an adequate theory of general individuation and it does not account for living individuals
.
Adaptive Behavior
28(1): 31–32.
Copy Citation
Villalobos and Razeto-Barry propose a theory of living individuals that includes both considerations about autopoietic systems and about material individuals. However, I think that their characterisation of individuality is problematic and would not be useful to account for living individuals.
Key words:
individual bodies
,
autopoiesis.
Bar R. (2020) The forgotten phenomenology: “Enactive perception” in the eyes of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 28(1): 53–72. https://cepa.info/7797
Bar R.
(
2020
)
The forgotten phenomenology: “Enactive perception” in the eyes of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty
.
Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy
28(1): 53–72.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7797
Copy Citation
This paper compares the enactive approach to perception, which has recently emerged in cognitive science, with the phenomenological approach. Inspired by Husserl and Merleau-Ponty, the enactive theorists Alva Noë and Evan Thompson take perception to be a result of the interaction between the brain, the body and the environment. Their argument turns mostly on the role of self-motion and sensorimotor knowledge in perceptual experience. It was said to be entirely consistent with phenomenology, indeed its revival. However, this issue is under debate. To show this, I begin with analyzing the enactive conception as a physicalist attempt to overcome the challenge of dualism and representationalism. I then turn to Husserl’s transcendental method and argue that Noë’s solution, unlike Husserl’s, remains naturalistic, as it does not take the phenomenon of intersubjectivity and the constitution of the “cultural world” into account. Afterwards I turn to Merleau-Ponty and demonstrate that there is some certain common ground with Noë, but also major differences. I conclude that the enactive approach is not completely refuted by the phenomenological one, insofar as the latter partly contains the first. Yet the enactivists deal merely with the necessary physiological conditions of perception qua animal perception, not with the sufficient sociocultural conditions for the understanding of human perception, like the inquiry into the historical and linguistic circumstances under which the understanding of human mind is made possible. The reason why the recent transformation of phenomenology into neurophenomenology is perceived as a revival is virtually inherent to the specific scientific ethos of enactivism and reveals a certain oblivion of the objectives of philosophical phenomenology.
Key words:
enactivism
,
husserl
,
merleau-ponty
,
perception
,
agency
Barnes G. & Možina M. (2020) Metalogue: How to Understand Bateson? In Memoriam Graham Barnes (1936-2020). Constructivist Foundations 16(1): 101–107. https://cepa.info/6827
Barnes G.
&
Možina M.
(
2020
)
Metalogue: How to Understand Bateson? In Memoriam Graham Barnes (1936-
2020
)
.
Constructivist Foundations
16(1): 101–107.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6827
Copy Citation
Context:
For Graham Barnes, the starting point of his research was the observation that most psychotherapists are trained in a theory-centered style of practice, neglecting epistemological and hermeneutical aspects. The consequence is an absence of critical self-reflection about some basic assumptions of psychotherapy theories and clinical practices in the psychotherapy community. When using a particular theory, therapists forget that the theory is “using” them, as well, i.e., they are unaware of the effects the theory has on them and on their relationships with clients. As an alternative to this ignorance, Barnes developed the concept, research project and clinical application of what he called “second-order psychotherapy.”
Problem:
How can we encourage therapists to engage in systematic self-reflection on the influence of theory on the content and structure of their therapeutic conversations? Following Bateson’s epistemological guidelines, we give an example of how our conversation about understanding his ideas includes conversation about our understanding of the conversation about an understanding of his ideas.
Method:
Bateson created a new didactic form of dialogical presentation to facilitate the understanding of knowing, called a metalogue, in which the content and the structure of the conversation are intertwined in such a way that it becomes more transparent how the metalevel of relationships between the speakers influences the content and vice versa.
Results:
By presenting our dialogues as an exemplary metalogue, we propose that metalogues could be a valuable didactic way for promoting epistemological and constructivist teaching and learning, not only for psychotherapists, but for all professionals who need better understanding of their understanding. This second-order understanding opens the space for the inclusion of self-reflection on our relationship (and its evolution) and how our relationship has shaped our understanding.
Implications:
Our proposal is also meant as an encouragement for contemporary constructivist thinkers to continue to reflect on Bateson’s contribution to the foundation and evolution of constructivism.
Key words:
Cybernetic epistemology
,
second-order psychotherapy
,
dialogotherapy
,
self-referential awareness
,
understanding
,
difference
,
schizophrenia
,
double bind
,
innocence
Baron P. (2020) Learning Is Lifelong but Can Be Quickened with Roleplays and Immediacy. Constructivist Foundations 15(2): 116–118. https://cepa.info/6332
Baron P.
(
2020
)
Learning Is Lifelong but Can Be Quickened with Roleplays and Immediacy
.
Constructivist Foundations
15(2): 116–118.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6332
Copy Citation
Open peer commentary on the article “I Can’t Yet and Growth Mindset” by Fiona Murphy & Hugh Gash.
Abstract:
Childhood is a sensitive developmental stage with lasting impacts into adulthood. Successful interventions that tackle poor learning strategies provide the child with a stronger foundation for dealing with adversity. Roleplays and immediacy are proposed as two methods of improving learning strategies.
Barrett L. (2020) What’s Wrong with Affordances? Constructivist Foundations 15(3): 229–230. https://cepa.info/6598
Barrett L.
(
2020
)
What’s Wrong with Affordances?
.
Constructivist Foundations
15(3): 229–230.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6598
Copy Citation
Open peer commentary on the article “Précis of The Philosophy of Affordances” by Manuel Heras-Escribano.
Abstract:
I question the notion that we need to understand affordances in terms of Rylean non-factualist dispositions. This is not because I disagree with Herlas-Escribano’s analysis; on the contrary, I consider it illuminating and essential. Rather, his analysis shows that affordances can be understood as originally defined by Gibson and elaborated by Stoffregen (i.e., as a particular kind of non-reductionist, non-physicalist relation between organism and environment. Translation into Rylean dispositions is therefore unnecessary.
Barrett N. F. (2020) Dissipative systems and living bodies. Adaptive Behavior 28(1): 47–48. https://cepa.info/6292
Barrett N. F.
(
2020
)
Dissipative systems and living bodies
.
Adaptive Behavior
28(1): 47–48.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6292
Copy Citation
I agree with Villalobos and Razeto-Barry’s main argument that living beings are autopoietic bodies. I suggest, however, that if we apply this definition of life to a consideration of living beings as dissipative systems, we find opportunities for further refinement. I propose that living bodies are autopoietic bodies that maintain themselves by using their boundaries to control their constituent processes of dissipative adaptation.
Key words:
dissipative systems
,
autopoiesis
,
living bodies.
Export result page as:
CF Format
·
APA
·
BibTex
·
EndNote
·
Harvard
·
MLA
·
Nature
·
RIS
·
Science
Page
1
2
...
20
21
Please provide us with your
feedback/evaluation/suggestions