Toggle navigation
CEPA.INFO
FAQ
BROWSE
Authors
Constructivist Approaches
Background Disciplines
Reading Lists
Latest Fulltext Additions
LOGIN
Search Results
Publications Found:
81
·
Show All Abstracts
·
Highlight Matches
Search CEPA
» Help with Search
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������/
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f�������������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/������������������������������������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f????��������������������������?��������������������������?��������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2f��������������������������������������������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/������������������������������������������������������������������������������?�������������������������E
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/????������������������������������������������������������������������������������?��������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2F������������������������������������������������������������������������������?�������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2F????��������������������������?��������������������������?��������������������������?�������������������������
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x2F????��������������������������?��������������������������?��������������������������?��������������������������?��������������������������?��������������������������?��������������������
By default, Find returns all publications that contain the words in the surnames of their author, in their titles, or in their years. For example,
Maturana
finds all publications authored by Maturana and publications that have "Maturana" in their title
Maturana 1974
finds all publications authored by Maturana in 1974
You can directly search for a reference by copy-pasting it. For example,
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Jean Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology
Unless a word (or phrase) if prefixed with a minus (-) it must be present in all results. Examples:
Glasersfeld Varela
shows all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld and Francisco Varela wrote together.
Glasersfeld "Jean Piaget"
finds all publications with
Glasersfeld
and
Jean Piaget
in it.
Prefix with
-
to indicate that this word must not be present in any result:
cognition -biology
will find entries that have
cognition
in the title but not
biology
.
Enter the surname of an author and a year to find all publications the author wrote in that year:
Glasersfeld 1995
presents all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld published in 1995.
Use
*
to match any characters:
constructivis*
matches constructivism and constructivist.
Enclose phrases between double quotes
"
to force phrase search:
"biology of cognition"
lists only the publications containing this phrase. Without the double quotes it will return all publications containing "biology" and all publications containing "cognition".
All the searches above match author names, titles and years. You can also address single fields:
author:glasersfeld title:reality
shows publications von Glasersfeld wrote on reality;
abstract:second-order
searches all abstracts for "second-order";
editor:Watzlawick
finds all books edited by Watzlawick.
Note there is no space after the colon.
Attention: Words of three letters and less are ignored.
"Not one, not two"
will return no result although there is
Varela's paper
of this title.
Bogotá J. D. (2022) Why not Both (but also, Neither)? Markov Blankets and the Idea of Enactive-Extended Cognition. Constructivist Foundations 17(3): 233–235. https://cepa.info/7936
Bogotá J. D.
(
2022
)
Why not Both (but also, Neither)? Markov Blankets and the Idea of Enactive-Extended Cognition.
Constructivist Foundations
17(3): 233–235.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7936
Copy Ref
Open peer commentary on the article “A Moving Boundary, a Plastic Core: A Contribution to the Third Wave of Extended-Mind Research” by Timotej Prosen.
Abstract:
I sympathize with Prosen’s conviction in integrating enactivism, the free-energy principle, and the extended-mind hypothesis. However, I show that he uses the concept of “boundary” ambiguously. By disambiguating it, I suggest that we can keep both Markov blankets and operational closure as ways of drawing the boundaries of a cognitive system. Nevertheless, from an enactive perspective, neither of those boundaries is a “cognitive” boundary.
Bogotá J. D. & Colombetti G. (2022) Can There Be a Unified 5E Theory of Pain? Constructivist Foundations 17(2): 150–152. https://cepa.info/7780
Bogotá J. D.
&
Colombetti G.
(
2022
)
Can There Be a Unified 5E Theory of Pain?
Constructivist Foundations
17(2): 150–152.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7780
Copy Ref
Open peer commentary on the article “Kaleidoscope of Pain: What and How Do You See Through It” by Maja Smrdu.
Abstract:
We agree with Smrdu that pain cannot be reduced to a neurophysiological event and we welcome a (micro-)phenomenological investigation of pain experience. However, we do not think such an investigation can provide sufficient support for either a 5E theory of pain, or (just) an enactive one. A 5E theory of pain would require a clarification of how the 5Es fit together. An enactive account would require a “circulation” between first- and third-person data.
Bruineberg J. P. (2022) Minds Without Borders. Constructivist Foundations 17(3): 231–233. https://cepa.info/7935
Bruineberg J. P.
(
2022
)
Minds Without Borders.
Constructivist Foundations
17(3): 231–233.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7935
Copy Ref
Open peer commentary on the article “A Moving Boundary, a Plastic Core: A Contribution to the Third Wave of Extended-Mind Research” by Timotej Prosen.
Abstract:
Prosen states that third-wave extended minds should have plastic boundaries. I question the current literature’s focus on locating the boundaries of the mind and discuss whether the current literature falls prey to a metaphysics of domestication. I reassess Prosen’s two desiderata for a third-wave extended mind and argue that third-wave extended mind theories are better off abandoning the “containment metaphor” altogether.
Candiotto L. (2022) Author’s Response: The Space In-Between. Constructivist Foundations 17(3): 214–219. https://cepa.info/7933
Candiotto L.
(
2022
)
Author’s Response: The Space In-Between.
Constructivist Foundations
17(3): 214–219.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7933
Copy Ref
Abstract:
The first set of topics is dedicated to the theoretical framework I employ in my target article. I will explain (a) why sense-making is participatory from the beginning and (b) how a personal communication with a place is possible. The second set of topics tackles my proposal’s ethical and political significance. I will consider (c) the objection on how it is possible to love the unlovable and (d) the question of what should change for us to love nature.
Candiotto L. (2022) Loving the Earth by Loving a Place: A Situated Approach to the Love of Nature. Constructivist Foundations 17(3): 179–189. https://cepa.info/7922
Candiotto L.
(
2022
)
Loving the Earth by Loving a Place: A Situated Approach to the Love of Nature.
Constructivist Foundations
17(3): 179–189.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7922
Copy Ref
Context:
I extend the enactive account of loving in romantic relationships that I developed with Hanne De Jaegher to the love of nature.
Problem:
I challenge a universal conceptualization of love of nature that does not account for the differences that are inherent to nature. As an alternative, I offer a situated account of loving a place as participatory sense-making. However, a question arises: How is it possible to communicate with the other-than-human?
Method:
I use panpsychist and enactive conceptual tools to better define this situated approach to the love of nature and to reply to the research question. In particular, I focus on Mathews’s “becoming native” and the generative tensions that unfold in a dialectic of encounter when a common language is not shared.
Results:
The fundamental difference experienced in encountering the other-than-human is generative for building up the human-Earth connection if we let each other be listened to. I describe the ethical dimension that permeates this type of “enactive listening” at the core of a situated account of love of nature.
Implications:
Love of nature is of paramount importance in our current climate crisis characterized by environmental anxiety, despair, and anger. A situated love of nature emphasizes the importance of community-based local interventions to preserve the Earth. Love, thus understood as a fundamental moral and political power, is a catalyst for environmental activism.
Constructivist content:
My article links to participatory sense-making as defined by De Jaegher and Di Paolo, and De Jaegher’s loving epistemology. It offers a broader understanding of participatory sense-making that includes the other-than-human. It also introduces the new concept of “enactive listening.”
Key words:
Becoming native
,
enactive listening
,
enactivism
,
Freya Mathews
,
love
,
nature
,
place
,
participatory sense-making
,
panpsychism
,
situated affectivity.
Carter C. L. (2022) Nelson Goodman’s Starmaking Philosophy Revisited. Constructivist Foundations 17(3): 267–268. https://cepa.info/7946
Carter C. L.
(
2022
)
Nelson Goodman’s Starmaking Philosophy Revisited.
Constructivist Foundations
17(3): 267–268.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7946
Copy Ref
Open peer commentary on the article “A Defence of Starmaking Constructivism: The Problem of Stuff” by Bin Liu.
Abstract:
I provide a brief account of key elements in Nelson Goodman’s starmaking constructivist philosophy and comment on Bin Liu’s defense of Goodman in the context of contemporary constructivist philosophy.
Chappell Z. (2022) The enacted ethics of self-injury. Topoi, Online first.
Chappell Z.
(
2022
)
The enacted ethics of self-injury.
Topoi,
Online first.
Copy Ref
Cowley S. (2022) Meaning comes first: Languaging and biosemiotics. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 15(2): 1–18. https://cepa.info/7793
Cowley S.
(
2022
)
Meaning comes first: Languaging and biosemiotics.
[The operational matrix of languaging: A radically relational understanding of language]
Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio
15(2): 1–18.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7793
Copy Ref
In linking evolution, biosemiotics and languaging, analysis of meaning is extended by investigation of natural innovation. Rather than ascribe it to internal or external content, meaning comes first. Ecological, evolutionary and developmental flux defy content/ vehicle distinctions. In the eco-evo-devo frame, I present the papers of the Special Issue, pose questions, and identify a direction of travel. Above all, meaning connects older views of semiosis with recent work on ecosystemic living. Whilst aesthetics and languaging can refer to evolving semiotic objects, nature uses bio-signals, judging experience, and how culture (and Languages) can condition free-living agents. Further, science changes its status when meaning takes priority. While semiotics shows the narrowness of laws and recurrent regularity, function brings semiotic properties to causal aspects of natural innovation. By drawing on languaging one can clarify, for example, how brains and prostheses can serve human cyborgs. Indeed, given a multi-scalar nexus of meaning, biosemiotics becomes a powerful epistemic tool. Accordingly, I close with a model of how observers can use languaging to track both how self-fabricated living systems co-modulate and also how judging (and thinking) shapes understanding of changing ‘worlds.’ In certain scales, each ’whole’ agent acts on its own behalf as it uses epigenetic history and adjusts to flux by engaging with an ecosystem
Key words:
biosemiotics
,
languaging
,
semiotics
,
eco-evo-devo
,
meaning
,
distributed language
de Haan S. (2022) Book Author’s Response: Continuity, not Conservatism: Why We Can Be Existential and Enactive. Constructivist Foundations 17(2): 173–178. https://cepa.info/7788
de Haan S.
(
2022
)
Book Author’s Response: Continuity, not Conservatism: Why We Can Be Existential and Enactive.
Constructivist Foundations
17(2): 173–178.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7788
Copy Ref
Abstract:
García’s and Oblak’s reviews of my book Enactive Psychiatry open up some fundamental debates with regard to my use of the term “enactive” for the kind of approach that I develop. Is my account still properly “enactive” (García) and how does my approach compare to the extended mind theory on the one hand and to constructivism on the other hand (Oblak? In this response, I argue that (a) adding an existential dimension to enactivism is necessary to do justice to our way of being in the world and our specific sense-making and its problems; and (b) that this dimension can be incorporated within enactivism without giving up on either enactivism’s commitment to naturalism or the enactive life-mind continuity thesis. My “existentialized” enactivism is very much enactive in that it adopts the thoroughly relational perspective that forms the core of enactivism. This relational perspective is also what distinguishes enactive theory from both extended mind theory and constructivism.
Erratum:
In §1, the name of the first commentator is misspelled: Her name is “Enara García” rather than “Elena García.”
De Jaegher H. & Preiser R. (2022) Breaking New Ground Through Participatory Sense-Making in Place. Constructivist Foundations 17(3): 190–192. https://cepa.info/7923
De Jaegher H.
&
Preiser R.
(
2022
)
Breaking New Ground Through Participatory Sense-Making in Place.
Constructivist Foundations
17(3): 190–192.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/7923
Copy Ref
Open peer commentary on the article “Loving the Earth by Loving a Place: A Situated Approach to the Love of Nature” by Laura Candiotto.
Abstract:
We highlight the radicalness of Candiotto’s proposal, by following the flow of the conceptual devices that create a new language for deepening ways of thinking and enacting our relation with the Earth, in terms of loving sense-making, enactive listening, and becoming native.
Export result page as:
CF Format
·
APA
·
BibTex
·
EndNote
·
Harvard
·
MLA
·
Nature
·
RIS
·
Science
Page
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Please provide us with your
feedback/evaluation/suggestions