Taylor J. G. (2008) Anticipation of Motor Acts: Good for Sportsmen, Bad for Thinkers. Constructivist Foundations 4(1): 30–31. Fulltext at https://cepa.info/122
Anticipation of Motor Acts: Good for Sportsmen, Bad for Thinkers.
Constructivist Foundations 4(1): 30–31.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/122
Open peer commentary on the target article “How and Why the Brain Lays the Foundations for a Conscious Self” by Martin V. Butz. Excerpt: This paper is full of stimulating and creative ideas. It posits that an anticipatory drive is what guides the development in the brain of a set of internal motor models, specifically a set of inverse and forward models. Through these models becoming increasingly complex, a conscious self develops. This is a simple and important thesis, if true. But is it? As my title suggests, it may be so for sportsmen, with their emphasis on ever more refined motor responses. However, those of a more cerebral nature may find themselves burdened by all those coupled internal motor models and not able to think as clearly as they would like. This is not to say that prediction isn’t a useful property to possess, both for finance (especially now) and in one’s general living patterns. But the question I wish to consider is: What sort of predictive model can lead to thinking?