Toggle navigation
CEPA.INFO
FAQ
BROWSE
Authors
Constructivist Approaches
Background Disciplines
Reading Lists
Latest Fulltext Additions
LOGIN
Results for “Kordeš U”
Publications Found:
25
·
Show All Abstracts
·
Highlight Matches
Search CEPA
» Help with Search
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/Ã�’Â�’ÂÂ�’Ã�’‚ÂÂ�’Ã�’Â�’†Ã�’‚Â’Ã�’Â�’ÂÂ�’Ã�’‚‚Ã�’Â�’¢Ã�â
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/??ï�¿�½??ï�¿�½
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/??�¿½??�¿½
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/??�¿½??�¿½?
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/??ï�¿�½??ï�¿�½?
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/??ï�¿�½??ï�¿�½?
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/??�¿½??�¿½?
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/??�¿½??�¿½
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/??�¿½??�¿½
fulltext:maturana9999922unionselectunhex(hex(version()))--22x22=22x/Ã�’Æ’Ã��/
By default, Find returns all publications that contain the words in the surnames of their author, in their titles, or in their years. For example,
Maturana
finds all publications authored by Maturana and publications that have "Maturana" in their title
Maturana 1974
finds all publications authored by Maturana in 1974
You can directly search for a reference by copy-pasting it. For example,
Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Jean Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology
Unless a word (or phrase) if prefixed with a minus (-) it must be present in all results. Examples:
Glasersfeld Varela
shows all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld and Francisco Varela wrote together.
Glasersfeld "Jean Piaget"
finds all publications with
Glasersfeld
and
Jean Piaget
in it.
Prefix with
-
to indicate that this word must not be present in any result:
cognition -biology
will find entries that have
cognition
in the title but not
biology
.
Enter the surname of an author and a year to find all publications the author wrote in that year:
Glasersfeld 1995
presents all publications Ernst von Glasersfeld published in 1995.
Use
*
to match any characters:
constructivis*
matches constructivism and constructivist.
Enclose phrases between double quotes
"
to force phrase search:
"biology of cognition"
lists only the publications containing this phrase. Without the double quotes it will return all publications containing "biology" and all publications containing "cognition".
All the searches above match author names, titles and years. You can also address single fields:
author:glasersfeld title:reality
shows publications von Glasersfeld wrote on reality;
abstract:second-order
searches all abstracts for "second-order";
editor:Watzlawick
finds all books edited by Watzlawick.
Note there is no space after the colon.
Attention: Words of three letters and less are ignored.
"Not one, not two"
will return no result although there is
Varela's paper
of this title.
Demšar E. & Kordeš U. (2018) A Different Vocabulary, or a Different Metaphor? Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 22–25. https://cepa.info/5579
Demšar E.
&
Kordeš U
.
(
2018
)
A Different Vocabulary, or a Different Metaphor?
Constructivist Foundations
14(1): 22–25.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/5579
Copy Ref
Open peer commentary on the article “Decentering the Brain: Embodied Cognition and the Critique of Neurocentrism and Narrow-Minded Philosophy of Mind” by Shaun Gallagher.
Abstract:
In agreement with Gallagher’s call to re-examine the standard neurocentric view, we situate the target article within constructivist epistemology. We point to certain similarities between E-approaches to cognition (in particular predictive processing accounts) and constructivist ideas originating from the tradition of second-order cybernetics, demonstrating the potential for a productive dialogue between contemporary cognitive science and constructivist theory. Further elaborating Gallagher’s proposal, we suggest an alternative, autopoiesis-based metaphor of the mind.
Kordeš U. (2005) A peaceful coexistence of epistemologies – philosophy from the constructivist’s point of view. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 295–305. https://cepa.info/2369
Kordeš U
.
(
2005
)
A peaceful coexistence of epistemologies – philosophy from the constructivist’s point of view.
Kybernetes
34(1/2): 295–305.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/2369
Copy Ref
Purpose:
To explore possible innovations that constructivism and its epistemological participatory position offer to philosophy, in particular to the age‐old problem of grounding epistemological assumptions. Design/methodology/approach – The paper follows von Foerster’s account of the participatory position as an epistemological stance. It tries to explain why it is called a “position” rather than “insight” or “theory.” Constructivist (participatory) concepts are explored and related to “classical” philosophical debates such as the “Münchhausen trilemma.” In the conclusion the paper sketches possible ways of how to apply the answers of the participatory position to the philosophical discourse.
Findings:
The paper points at the possibility to go beyond the insurmountable boundaries dividing different epistemological positions one continuously encounters when searching for the appropriate epistemological starting point. As a result, one cannot expect answers to be universally valid. The paper takes that into consideration. It argues that most philosophical attempts are first order changes (revolutions) as they seek truth and exclude alternative views at the same time. Following von Foerster, the paper suggests second order changes that lead from truth to trust. This transition allows a peaceful coexistence of all philosophical systems. Turning from truth (and belief in analytical clarity) to trust and, consequently, from objectivity to responsibility, it may become possible to transcend the epistemological barriers. Originality/value – The paper contributes to finding a possible direction for the future of discourses in philosophy and many humanities in order to overcome the incompetence of philosophy of finding final answers.
Key words:
Cognition
,
epistemology
,
undecidability
,
participatory position
,
constructivism
Kordes U. (2005) A peaceful coexistence of epistemologies: Philosophy from the constructivist’s point of view. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 295–305.
Kordes U.
(
2005
)
A peaceful coexistence of epistemologies: Philosophy from the constructivist’s point of view.
Kybernetes
34(1/2): 295–305.
Copy Ref
Purpose:
To explore possible innovations that constructivism and its epistemological participatory position offer to philosophy, in particular to the age-old problem of grounding epistemological assumptions. Design/methodology/approach – The paper follows von Foerster’s account of the participatory position as an epistemological stance. It tries to explain why it is called a “position” rather than “insight” or “theory.” Constructivist (participatory) concepts are explored and related to “classical” philosophical debates such as the “Münchhausen trilemma” In the conclusion the paper sketches possible ways of how to apply the answers of the participatory position to the philosophical discourse.
Findings:
The paper points at the possibility to go beyond the insurmountable boundaries dividing different epistemological positions one continuously encounters when searching for the appropriate epistemological starting point. As a result, one cannot expect answers to be universally valid. The paper takes that into consideration. It argues that most philosophical attempts are first order changes (revolutions) as they seek truth and exclude alternative views at the same time. Following von Foerster, the paper suggests second order changes that lead from truth to trust. This transition allows a peaceful coexistence of all philosophical systems. Turning from truth (and belief in analytical clarity) to trust and, consequently, from objectivity to responsibility, it may become possible to transcend the epistemological barriers. Originality/value – The paper contributes to finding a possible direction for the future of discourses in philosophy and many humanities in order to overcome the incompetence of philosophy of finding final answers.
Key words:
cognition
,
cybernetics
,
epistemology.
Kordeš U. (2009) The phenomenology of decision making. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 7(2): 65–77. https://cepa.info/6546
Kordeš U
.
(
2009
)
The phenomenology of decision making.
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
7(2): 65–77.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/6546
Copy Ref
It is becoming apparent in modern cognitive science that the lack of knowledge about human experiential landscape implies the loss of a very important element, perhaps the very essence. Consequently, a rather new area of research has emerged recently: an attempt at a systematic observation and study of experience. This is the so-called phenomenologically inspired research (or just phenomenological research). Part of this article aims to present this new area of research – it describes the common fundaments of the field and some of its characteristic methodological derivates, relating them to the possibility of studying decision making from the first-person point-of-view, i.e. decision making as an experiential phenomenon (and not as a neurological or behavioural process). The article also presents some of the findings phenomenological studies have led to and some theoretical reflexions encouraged by these insights.
Key words:
experience
,
experiencing
,
phenomenology
,
phenomenological research
,
reason
,
first-person.
Kordeš U. (2012) Thinking of experience, experiencing thinking. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 10(3): 223–234. https://cepa.info/4327
Kordeš U
.
(
2012
)
Thinking of experience, experiencing thinking.
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
10(3): 223–234.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/4327
Copy Ref
The article briefly describes the relatively young field of cognitive science dedicated to the research of lived human experience – the so-called phenomenological inquiry (or first-person research). It enumerates the reasons for the renewed interest in the study of experience and outlines the field’s relation to the rest of cognitive science. With the help of an example (phenomenology of thinking), the article attempts to illustrate the importance of systematic study of experience and addresses some open questions emerging from such an enterprise.
Key words:
phenomenological inquiry
,
first-person perspective
,
experience
,
thoughts
Kordeš U. (2013) Problems and opportunities of first-person research. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 11(4): 363–375. https://cepa.info/4324
Kordeš U
.
(
2013
)
Problems and opportunities of first-person research.
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
11(4): 363–375.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/4324
Copy Ref
The aim of the article is twofold. First, it aims to overview current empirical methods in the area of first-person research. Such a review cannot overlook epistemological and ontological issues, but must at the same time keep in mind methodological and almost technical nature of the problem. Empirical experience research is positioned within the frame of cognitive science and the overview of approaches and techniques of empirical phenomenology is presented, together with epistemological considerations. The second aim of the paper is concerned with the future of research in the discussed area. It suggests that in-depth, existentially liable introspection and self-inquiry should be considered as serious scientific research tools.
Key words:
empirical phenomenology
,
first-person methods
,
cognitive science
,
mindfulness
Kordeš U. (2015) A better metaphor for understanding consciousness? Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 13(4): 525–533. https://cepa.info/2512
Kordeš U
.
(
2015
)
A better metaphor for understanding consciousness?
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
13(4): 525–533.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/2512
Copy Ref
The article is an attempt at – yet once again – finding a source of more fitting metaphor for the study of consciousness inside the framework of quantum mechanics. It starts by doubting into the possibility of the naturalization of research of experience. Proceeding from that it searches for a more adequate way to implement Varela’s idea about a balanced bridging the explanatory gap. By comparing certain positions of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanical phenomena with the properties of introspection, it tries to point out that there might exist better epistemic positions for understanding consciousness than the ones most frequently used today.
Kordeš U. (2015) The Interesting Similarity of Religious and Everyday Epistemic Positions. Constructivist Foundations 11(1): 126–128. https://cepa.info/2234
Kordeš U
.
(
2015
)
The Interesting Similarity of Religious and Everyday Epistemic Positions.
Constructivist Foundations
11(1): 126–128.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/2234
Copy Ref
Open peer commentary on the article “Religion: A Radical-Constructivist Perspective” by Andreas Quale.
Upshot:
Quale argues that radical constructivism and religion are incompatible: a believer must necessarily be a realist, while radical constructivism, with its fundamental relativistic epistemology, can neither confirm nor deny religious beliefs. In the commentary, I first question Quale’s distinction between cognitive and non-cognitive knowledge, especially from the point of view of the discussion of religious beliefs. Later on, I follow his argumentation of the epistemic position associated with religious belief and point out that Quale’s conclusions could be extrapolated, presenting a basis for an interesting and relevant discussion about the split between the everyday and the constructivist epistemic positions.
Kordeš U. (2016) Author’s Response: Persevering with the Non-Trivial. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 400–406. https://cepa.info/2598
Kordeš U
.
(
2016
)
Author’s Response: Persevering with the Non-Trivial.
Constructivist Foundations
11(2): 400–406.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/2598
Copy Ref
Upshot:
The response starts with a clarification of certain points that commentators found insufficiently articulated and then goes on to discuss some of the suggested solutions, all of which are seen as welcome improvements to the original proposal. The need for establishing a research environment acknowledging and nurturing the non-trivial character of experience is emphasised.
Kordeš U. (2016) Dreams: An Experimental Laboratory of Phenomenology. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 423–425. https://cepa.info/2603
Kordeš U
.
(
2016
)
Dreams: An Experimental Laboratory of Phenomenology.
Constructivist Foundations
11(2): 423–425.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/2603
Copy Ref
Open peer commentary on the article “Exploring the Depth of Dream Experience: The Enactive Framework and Methods for Neurophenomenological Research” by Elizaveta Solomonova & Xin Wei Sha.
Upshot:
Solomonova and Sha propose a research programme for the study of dreaming based on the theoretical framework of enactivism. This commentary intends to demonstrate several unclear points connected to the theoretical framework applied and the proposed methodological solutions. By considering the potential reach of various phenomenological approaches in the research of dreams, I intend to show that taking a more radical phenomenological position might further support the authors’ intention to de-pathologise the research of dreams and, even more importantly, might open up a significant new testing ground for the research of lived human experience.
Export result page as:
CF Format
·
APA
·
BibTex
·
EndNote
·
Harvard
·
MLA
·
Nature
·
RIS
·
Science
Page
1
2
3
Please provide us with your
feedback/evaluation/suggestions