Petit J.-L. (2016) Is Intentionality Banned from Sciences of the Living Being? Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 218–219. https://cepa.info/2545
Petit J.-L.
(
2016)
Is Intentionality Banned from Sciences of the Living Being?
Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 218–219.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/2545
Open peer commentary on the article “Lived Experience and Cognitive Science Reappraising Enactivism’s Jonasian Turn” by Mario Villalobos & Dave Ward. Upshot: This commentary questions an assumption in the target article to the effect that science prohibits projecting any intentional properties or entities outside of human experience.
Petit J.-L. (2019) Back to the Subject of Pathological Experience. Constructivist Foundations 14(2): 214–216. https://cepa.info/5776
Petit J.-L.
(
2019)
Back to the Subject of Pathological Experience.
Constructivist Foundations 14(2): 214–216.
Fulltext at https://cepa.info/5776
Open peer commentary on the article “Applying the Neurophenomenological Approach to the Study of Trauma: Theory and Practice Yochai Ataria, Mooli Lahad & Omer Horovitz The Study of Trauma” by Yochai Ataria, Mooli Lahad & Omer Horovitz. Abstract: The return to the subject can be understood in two senses: as the bearer of lived experience or as the transcendental instance that gives meaning to this experience. The methodological commitment of phenomenology to the sense of experience poses a problem for its access to the subjective origins of a pathological experience whose meaning eludes reflection. A rigorous application of the phenomenological method requires a reminder of the outline of the solution to this problem at the transcendental level of constitution of the world of life.