Thomas Hainscho is employed at the Karl Popper collection of the University Library Klagenfurt. He recently completed his dissertation in philosophy on the machine model of the human body in early modern philosophy. His main research interests are the history of (early modern) philosophy and philosophy of language.
Hainscho T. (2015) Wahre Geschichte: Bemerkungen zu einem nicht-dualistischen Verständnis von Geschichte [True history: Remarks on a non-dualistic understanding of history]. In: Kanzian C. & Mitterer J. & Neges K. (eds.) Realism – relativism – constructivism: Contributions of the 38th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, Kirchberg am Wechsel: 117–119. https://cepa.info/5345
Open peer commentary on the article “Semiosis as Eigenform and Observation as Recursive Interpretation” by Diana Gasparyan. Abstract: I discuss what it means to comprehend in Gasparyan’s theory that defines language as an eigenform. For that, I raise questions concerning the conditions of mutual understanding of signs, Gasparyan’s pragmatic approach, and her reference to society as a limit of interpretation.
Hainscho T. (2020) The Temporal Order in an Inconsistent Non-Dualism. Constructivist Foundations 15(2): 185–186. https://cepa.info/6350
Open peer commentary on the article “Why Josef Mitterer’s Non-Dualism Is Inconsistent” by Stefan Weber. Abstract: Some of Weber’s objections rely on an abstract conception of time. This conception is incompatible with Mitterer’s claims.