Author J. R. Matyja
Biography: Jakub Ryszard Matyja is a PhD researcher in Philosophy at Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland and in Music at University of Huddersfield, UK.
He graduated from University of Edinburgh (MSc in Mind, Language and Embodied Cognition) and is currently working on embodied and enactive (music) cognition.
Matyja J. R. (2012) Me, Music, and I: Embodied and Enactive Cognition meets Music. Review of “Music and Consciousness” edited by David and Erik Clarke. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 129-131. https://constructivist.info/8/1/129
Matyja J. R.
(
2012)
Me, Music, and I: Embodied and Enactive Cognition meets Music. Review of “Music and Consciousness” edited by David and Erik Clarke.
Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 129-131.
Fulltext at https://constructivist.info/8/1/129
Upshot: The fact that both “consciousness” and “music” are quite elusive terms makes the attempt to explain the nature (or even the existence of) “musical consciousness” a compelling quest. The papers in this book tackle these problems in an engaging way, ranging from sociology of music to drug altered music cognition. Some also apply enactive and ecological approaches to music cognition, which makes the book an interesting read for constructivists.
Matyja J. R. (2013) Back to Basics. Review of “Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content” by Daniel D. Hutto and Erik Myin. Constructivist Foundations 8(3): 362-363. https://constructivist.info/8/3/362
Matyja J. R.
(
2013)
Back to Basics. Review of “Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content” by Daniel D. Hutto and Erik Myin.
Constructivist Foundations 8(3): 362-363.
Fulltext at https://constructivist.info/8/3/362
Upshot: Hutto & Myin’s latest “radical enactive cognition” manifesto is a truly exciting book and – despite its short length – quite thick with argumentation. The word “manifesto” here does not only describe the rousing writing style (filled with witty and resounding expressions), but also the general awed feeling one gets, while reading, of the importance of “RECtifying” the current state of research in enactive cognition. Interestingly for the constructivist community, the hallmark thesis of their book is that there can be intentionally directed cognition and perceptual experience without content.
Matyja J. R. & Schiavio A. (2013) Enactive Music Cognition: Background and Research Themes. Constructivist Foundations 8(3): 351-357. https://constructivist.info/8/3/351
Matyja J. R. & Schiavio A.
(
2013)
Enactive Music Cognition: Background and Research Themes.
Constructivist Foundations 8(3): 351-357.
Fulltext at https://constructivist.info/8/3/351
Context: The past few years have presented us with a growing amount of theoretical research (yet that is often based on neuroscientific developments) in the field of enactive music cognition. Problem: Current cognitivist and embodied approaches to music cognition suffer, in our opinion, from a too firm commitment to the explanatory role of mental representations in musical experience. This particular problem can be solved by adopting an enactive approach to music cognition. Method: We present and compare cognitivist, embodied and enactive approaches to music cognition and review the current research in enactive music cognition. Results: We find that, in general, the enactive approaches to human musicality are capable of explaining the basic relationship between a musical subject and a musical object according to a pre-conceptual and pre-linguistic form of understanding related to bodily motor expertise. This explanation does not rely on on sophisticated forms of representation. Implications: Proponents of enactive music cognition should, in our opinion, focus on providing a consistent explanation of the most basic level of musical understanding. Constructivist content: We hope to invite the constructivist community to engage with the discussions on the intersection between music and enactivism.
Export result page as:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·